-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I do'nt find the transpec specification that causes it to happen.
Has this any effect on the output?
Can I close the bugreport or tag it severtity minor?
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http:
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#112105: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#189222: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#111918: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override
says libdevel.
libglade0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says
libdevel.
libgl
Accepted:
libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-gnome0
Your message dated Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:03:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libgtop-daemon: v1.0.13-7 install error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
The patch is the diff before running libtoolize, ...
Changes to have an updated package :
* Using automake 1.4, autoconf 2.13, libtool 1.4
* Comment AM_FUNC_ERROR_AT_LINE in macros/gnome-support.m4
* Add AM_MAINTAINER_MODE to configure.in
(the patch has these changes, no changes after running t
Accepted:
libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-gnome0
Accepted:
libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop1_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop1_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop_1.0.
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb: package says section is utils, override
says admin.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195985: fixed in libgtop 1.0.13-7.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#183979: fixed in libgtop 1.0.13-7.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
13 matches
Mail list logo