Bug#148926: Fwd: Re: [clisp-list] Bug Report: clisp eats whole memory

-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: [clisp-list] Bug Report: clisp eats whole memory Date: 15 Jun 2002 13:14:39 -0400 From: Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * On the subject of "[c

Bug#149131: Fwd: Re: [clisp-list] Bug Report: clisp accepts, as accessor to object, name that conflicts with build-in function

-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: [clisp-list] Bug Report: clisp accepts, as accessor to object, name that conflicts with build-in function Date: 15 Jun 2002 13:06:18 -0400 From: Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Bug#148926: marked as done (clisp eats whole memory)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:32:05 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen