Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 01:25:50 +0200
with message-id <87y62ayy47@marvin.43-1.org>
and subject line Bug#626616: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #553766,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be mar
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:47:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553737: fixed in cdcd 0.6.6-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #553737,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:49:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553724: fixed in apachetop 0.12.6-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #553724,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:55:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#614188: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #553841,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 01:21:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#508501: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #553811,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:32:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553766: fixed in gnome-pilot 2.32.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #553766,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2011 12:04:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553842: fixed in rplay 3.3.2-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #553842,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 02:10:46 +0100 (MET) Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: rpncalc
> Version: 1.36.8
> Severity: important
> User: d...@debian.org
> Usertags: readline6
>
[...]
> Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
> in unstable and testing. If possible, please repla
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:02:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Package xbsql has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #553879,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Package adesklets has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #553714,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:17:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553858: fixed in sqlrelay 1:0.39.4-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #553858,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2010 12:36:00 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Package gdb-m68hc1x has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #553769,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553794: fixed in lash 0.5.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #553794,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:02:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553861: fixed in stk 4.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #553861,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:32:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553759: fixed in fuzz 0.6-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #553759,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:28:16 +0100
with message-id <8b2d7b4d0912200928w7327ca4ep2b865fa4fdff9...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Package removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #553837,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
Your message dated Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:55:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553790: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #553790,
regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Quoting Matthias Klose (d...@cs.tu-berlin.de):
> Package: isdnutils
> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
> Severity: important
> User: d...@debian.org
> Usertags: readline6
>
> Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
> As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Package: xbsql
Version: 0.11-8
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unst
Package: sqlrelay
Version: 1:0.39.4-9
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
Package: rpncalc
Version: 1.36.8
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in un
Package: rhyme
Version: 0.9-6
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unsta
Package: rpc2
Version: 2.8+debian-4
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in
Package: rplay
Version: 3.3.2-12
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in un
Package: mn-fit
Version: 5.13-7
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in uns
Package: lash
Version: 0.5.4-3
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unst
Package: isdnutils
Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now ava
Package: fuzz
Version: 0.6-8
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unstab
Package: cdcd
Version: 0.6.6-11
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in uns
Package: gdb-m68hc1x
Version: 1:6.4+3.1+dfsg-5
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now a
Package: apachetop
Version: 0.12.6-12
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
Package: adesklets
Version: 0.6.1-5
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev
build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the
libreadline sona
33 matches
Mail list logo
