Re: libnewt transition from 0.51 to 0.52

2006-03-19 Thread Chris Lawrence
On 3/19/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the exception of gnome-lokkit (previous binNMU using the old ".0.1" > version numbering scheme), all of these packages should be binNMUable for > the transition. I've just scheduled binNMUs across all architectures on the > autobuilders

Re: libnewt transition from 0.51 to 0.52

2006-03-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 08:01:54PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > You are receiving this mail because you maintain a package that depends > on libnewt0.51. > This has now moved to 0.52 in upstream, and the versioned symbols patch > from Debian was applied > with the 0.52 tag, requiring that

libnewt transition from 0.51 to 0.52

2006-03-19 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, You are receiving this mail because you maintain a package that depends on libnewt0.51. This has now moved to 0.52 in upstream, and the versioned symbols patch from Debian was applied with the 0.52 tag, requiring that all packages depending on libnewt0.51 be rebuilt to depend on libnewt