freewrl

2011-09-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Stephen, Thanks for your freewrl upload (1.07-1) that has updated the Maintainer field to the Debian QA Team. I have just moved the git repository from pkg-multimedia to http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/freewrl.git in order to make it accessible to a wider audience. Cheers

freewrl and firefox plugin

2006-01-04 Thread Imanol Aranaga
Hello: I am using Ubuntu 5.10 and installed freewrl 1.07-1 from Universe. I am looking for npfreewrl.so but I think this packet comes without it How can I get the npfreewrl.so to make the link to the plugins directory? thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#307832: freewrl: NO plugin file included

2005-05-05 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
severity 307832 important thanks On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:09:12PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > [1] This is what aptitude says is included with thie package: > > # aptitude show freewrl > Package: freewrl > State: installed > Automatically installed: no

Processed: Re: Bug#307832: freewrl: NO plugin file included

2005-05-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 307832 important Bug#307832: freewrl: NO plugin file included Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#307832: freewrl: NO plugin file included

2005-05-05 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Package: freewrl Version: 1.07-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [1] This is what aptitude says is included with thie package: # aptitude show freewrl Package: freewrl State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 1.07-1 ... Description: VRML browser and

Re: FreeWRL: FreeWRL 1.11 released.

2005-04-07 Thread Joerg Scheurich aka MUFTI
> Me too. And I've also so far only been successful in installing FreeWRL > through apt-get, and their package is a few versions behind http://packages.debian.net/unstable/source/freewrl | Source package: freewrl (1.07-1) Is this the current freewrl version on debian ? AFAIK t

Bug#298960: freewrl: contains non-free fonts

2005-04-04 Thread Peter De Wachter
h files from these packages could be used instead of the > ones included in freewrl? I don't know *how* freewrl uses them, but I > saw that they are simply copied in the binary-arch target of > debian/rules - it should be straightforward to create symlinks. One > would just have to

Bug#298960: freewrl: contains non-free fonts

2005-04-01 Thread Frank Küster
Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: freewrl > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.2.1 > > This package contains many Bitstream fonts. The README file does not > include a license The font files are: $ dlocate -L freewrl | grep font /usr/sha

Bug#298960: freewrl: contains non-free fonts

2005-03-10 Thread Peter De Wachter
Package: freewrl Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains many Bitstream fonts. The README file does not include a license, instead it states they were copied from Red Hat 7.2. I downloaded that distribution, but could find no trace of the fonts. Without a free license