Your message dated Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341886: fixed in distributed-net 2.9012.497-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#212874: fixed in distributed-net 2.9012.497-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316918: fixed in distributed-net 2.9012.497-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.9001.478-2
Severity: grave
The OCR phase 1 and RC5-64 projects have now been finished. Please could the
distributed-net package be updated as this makes the current package unusable.
Thanks
Konrad D.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
retitle 290890 RM: distributed-net-pproxy -- RoQA; Orphaned, non-free,
uselessly-buggy, outdated
tags 290890 confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I'm reassigning this bug as RC on -pproxy to at least keep it out of
> sarge. If L
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 241112 distributed-net-pproxy
Bug#241112: Please remove distributed-net-pproxy.
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `distributed-net-pproxy'.
> severity 241112 serious
Bug#241112: Please remove distributed-net-ppro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 145410 + pending
Bug#145410: distributed-net-pproxy: /etc/init.d/distributed-net-pproxy doesn't
work properly
Tags were: patch
Bug#163468: distributed-net-pproxy: start-stop-daemon changed syntax, --chuid
isneeded to change u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 241112 ftp.debian.org
Bug#241112: Please remove distributed-net-pproxy.
Bug reassigned from package `distributed-net-pproxy' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Quoting Brian Minton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I would like to see a seperate user, 'dnetc' with a home directory of
> /var/lib/distributed-net to run the distributed.net client. That way I
> could give it full permissions in that directory. This would be useful
>
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.9008.490-1
Severity: wishlist
I would like to see a seperate user, 'dnetc' with a home directory of
/var/lib/distributed-net to run the distributed.net client. That way I
could give it full permissions in that directory. This would be useful
for i
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:17:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251760: fixed in distributed-net 2.9008.490-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:17:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250244: fixed in distributed-net 2.9008.490-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:17:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177360: fixed in distributed-net 2.9008.490-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:17:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#186795: fixed in distributed-net 2.9008.490-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:17:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203305: fixed in distributed-net 2.9008.490-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:17:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231481: fixed in distributed-net 2.9008.490-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.9001.478-2
Severity: important
New version of binary from distributed.net is necessary for contributing
towards the second phase of OGR.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Ar
Package: distributed-net-pproxy
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
This package is in non-free and has been orphaned for a while. It has an
important functionality bug (#145410) that nobody cared to fix for almost 2
years now. It's also very unpopular (only 1 person voted for it in popcon).
I reco
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 99954 distributed-net
Bug#99954: the shutdown process should not freeze when a /etc/init.d script
freezes
Bug reassigned from package `sysvinit' to `distributed-net'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.9001.478-2
Severity: important
Current distributed-net client failed with 'segmentation failed' when started.
Also it's
a bit outdated and it seems there is no way to use it in rc5-72 contest. I
suggested update to latest
version.
Anyway lates
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.9001.478-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid
After apt-get upgrading distributed-net from Sarge (distributed-net version
2.8015.46-10), the package unpacks, but
then it hangs on "setting up distributed-net". Distributed-net version
2.8015.46-10 was
Dear Maintainers,
Can you please setup 0 as a default option in postinst script of distributed-net
It is very important for automatic installation on multiple machines to
have some default value set.
Thank you in advance
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.9001.478-2 (not installed)
Severity: wishlist
This is FYI.
The script /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/distributed-net can now be installed using
dh_installppp. You need to Build-Depend on debhelper >= 4.1.68 to use this.
For this to work you need to rename
debian/ip-up
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.9001.478-2 (not installed)
Severity: minor
If on_ac_power returns a non-true status that means either that the
machine is not on AC power (exit status 1) or that on_ac_power couldn't
tell whether or not the machine is on AC power (exit status 255).
Please
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.8015.46-10
Severity: important
Hello Noel,
/usr/bin/distributed-net has wrong endianness on mips-linux, little
endian instead of big endian. This prevents even the configuration
of the package. The version in stable has the same problem, so I'm
likel
Colin Watson wrote:
I think /sbin should go on the end, to allow a sysadmin to call that
script from a shell with PATH=/usr/local/sbin:... and have tools in
/usr/local/sbin override the system ones. ssh's init script does this:
export PATH="${PATH:+$PATH:}/usr/sbin:/sbin"
That sounds very r
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:35:34AM +0100, Matthew Exley wrote:
> Package: distributed-net
> Version: 2.9001.478-2
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> /etc/init.d/distributed-net fails to stop the client if run from a
> non-interactive shell, e.g. if run from a cron job (where
Package: distributed-net
Version: 2.9001.478-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
/etc/init.d/distributed-net fails to stop the client if run from a
non-interactive shell, e.g. if run from a cron job (where the client is
only scheduled to run overnight, for example), then the output of:
"/etc/i
Accepted:
distributed-net-pproxy_319c-7.diff.gz
to
pool/non-free/d/distributed-net-pproxy/distributed-net-pproxy_319c-7.diff.gz
distributed-net-pproxy_319c-7.dsc
to pool/non-free/d/distributed-net-pproxy/distributed-net-pproxy_319c-7.dsc
distributed-net-pproxy_319c-7_i386.deb
to
pool/non
36 matches
Mail list logo
