Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-07 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Andreas, * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 22:40]: > > A ready package, that solve this bug is already available. > > Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload? > > Well, finding a sponsor is sometimes rather difficult. I'm sorry, but > that's just the c

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-07 Thread Andreas Barth
* Erik Schanze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040806 23:25]: > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package. The QA group doesn't adopt packages, they are the _default_ owner of any package and bug if nobody is the current maintainer. So, as the package is currently orphaned, they are mentioned cur

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-06 Thread John Goerzen
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:59:56AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > > As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as > > is proper procedure when orphaning. > > > Aha, I was puzzled about: Erik, I think we all do appreciate your enthusiasm here. I think it is great that you

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-06 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti: ... > depending on work pressures). It would probably be best to wait for a > while before a new version is uploaded, to avoid putting unnecessary > pressure on the buildds right now, they seem to be o

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-06 Thread Erik Schanze
Hello Lars! Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti: > > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package. > > I'd like to veto here. > > As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as > is proper procedure when orpha

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-06 Thread Lars Wirzenius
la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti: > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package. > I'd like to veto here. As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as is proper procedure when orphaning. What was not proper procedure was that I didn't re-tit

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-06 Thread John Goerzen
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:09:16PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package. > I'd like to veto here. They did no such thing. As the previous maintainer, I set the maintainer to Debian QA, which is the *right and proper thing to do* until the new person a