Processed: Re: autofs: new upstream version (5.1.5) available

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #912947 [src:autofs] autofs: new upstream version (5.1.5) available Marked Bug as done > fixed -1 5.1.5-1 Bug #912947 {Done: Mike Gabriel } [src:autofs] autofs: new upstream version (5.1.5) available Marked as fixed in versions autofs/5.1.5-1. -- 9129

Processed: Re: autofs: Orphaning package?

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #917228 [src:autofs] autofs: Orphaning package? Marked Bug as done -- 917228: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917228 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: autofs: automount doesn't work with numerical IPv6 address

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #709366 [autofs] autofs: automount doesn't work with numerical IPv6 address Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 709366: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709366 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: autofs: Fail while installing (arm64)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #861992 [autofs] autofs: Fail while installing (arm64) Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 861992: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861992 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: autofs: Autofs does not unmount mounted filesystems after HUP

Processing control commands: > fixed -1 5.1.0-1 Bug #832628 [autofs] autofs: Autofs does not unmount mounted filesystems after HUP Marked as fixed in versions autofs/5.1.0-1. > tags -1 jessie Bug #832628 [autofs] autofs: Autofs does not unmount mounted filesystems after HUP Added tag(s) jessie.

Processed: Re: autofs should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 autofs should build-depend and recommend e2fsprogs Bug #887284 [autofs] autofs should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly Changed Bug title to 'autofs should build-depend and recommend e2fsprogs' from 'autofs should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly'. > tags -1 +

Re: autofs

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:08:05PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:58:17PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Yes, just a fix of my previous QA upload. I'm aware of your > > current activities. Eventually, I'll post patches or comments on BTS. I have > > a work

Re: autofs

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:58:17PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Yes, just a fix of my previous QA upload. I'm aware of your > current activities. Eventually, I'll post patches or comments on BTS. I have > a working NIS environment here, just if you need a testbed or something. If you cou

Re: autofs

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:23:55PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > I'm currently preparing to take over autofs (as should be evident from my > recent activity in the BTS :-) ), but I'm awaiting the response on > #278229 (to find out if the patch is worthwhile or not), and I'll have to > find o

Processed: Re: autofs: Fails to mount specified mountpoints. No logging output.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 280706 Bug#280706: autofs: Fails to mount specified mountpoints. No logging output. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 280706 wishlist Bug#280706: autofs: Fails to mount specified mountpoints. No logging output. Severity set to `