On 2010-03-15 10:14 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:36:28AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I'm ready to upgrade master to the current patchlevel (did that here
>> yesterday and installed the resulting packages locally) but I wanted to
>> ask you first, see <87r5nn2uq0@tur
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Craig Small wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:36:28AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
I'm ready to upgrade master to the current patchlevel (did that here
yesterday and installed the resulting packages locally) but I wanted to
ask you first, see <87r5nn2uq0@turtle.gmx.de>.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:36:28AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I'm ready to upgrade master to the current patchlevel (did that here
> yesterday and installed the resulting packages locally) but I wanted to
> ask you first, see <87r5nn2uq0@turtle.gmx.de>.
Strange, I cannot find it. I think it w
On 2010-03-14 23:05 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:15:55PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Thanks for providing the manpage(s) now, but there is a little problem.
>> At least in out-of-tree builds (like in the Debian package),
>> ncurses*-config.1 does not get installed when
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:15:55PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Thanks for providing the manpage(s) now, but there is a little problem.
> At least in out-of-tree builds (like in the Debian package),
> ncurses*-config.1 does not get installed when running "make install"
> because (like terminfo.5) i
On 2010-03-12 00:07 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 03:37:51PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> >Thanks for providing the manpage(s) now, but there is a little problem.
>> >At least in out-of-tree builds (like in the Debian package),
>>
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Craig Small wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 03:37:51PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
Thanks for providing the manpage(s) now, but there is a little problem.
At least in out-of-tree builds (like in the Debian package),
ncurses*-config.1
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 03:37:51PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >Thanks for providing the manpage(s) now, but there is a little problem.
> >At least in out-of-tree builds (like in the Debian package),
> >ncurses*-config.1 does not get installed when runnin
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-03-02 22:47 +0100, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-02-23 05:37 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
Done, after using the new version for a day without n
On 2010-03-02 22:47 +0100, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2010-02-23 05:37 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
Done, after using the new version for a day without noticing any
problems and
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-02-23 05:37 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
Done, after using the new version for a day without noticing any
problems and building a few packages with it.
I got two lintian warnings about
On 2010-02-23 05:37 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Done, after using the new version for a day without noticing any
>> problems and building a few packages with it.
> I got two lintian warnings about the *-config programs not having man
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Done, after using the new version for a day without noticing any
> problems and building a few packages with it.
I got two lintian warnings about the *-config programs not having man
pages but it's pretty minor thing. Probably look at
On 2010-02-22 03:50 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:35:05AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> In the light of that and given that additional symbols have been
>> introduced since then, I would like to switch to the current upstream
>> patchlevel now, as there might be not anothe
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:35:05AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> In the light of that and given that additional symbols have been
> introduced since then, I would like to switch to the current upstream
> patchlevel now, as there might be not another chance to do this before
> the squeeze freeze. It
On 2010-02-18 16:59 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-02-18 11:27 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
>
>> I'd like #556378 fixed beforehand, if possible. This is the -static
>> problem, which Sven tried to fix with the --without-dlsym and had
>> build troubles. If I can get some idea on how tricky it i
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:59:55PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> It seems to me that we need a shlibs bump as there are two new
> functions, is_pad() and is_subwin(), see the 20090906 NEWS entry.
> Which means that we could disrupt whatever transition is going on right
> now. Sorry for not noticing
On 2010-02-18 11:27 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello Sven, Thomas and anyone tracking ncurses,
> Apologies if you get double posts, I'm not sure if you are subscribed
> to the packages email alias or not.
I am, but I much rather receive a message twice than never.
> I think we're pretty close
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Craig Small wrote:
Hello Sven, Thomas and anyone tracking ncurses,
Apologies if you get double posts, I'm not sure if you are subscribed
to the packages email alias or not.
I think we're pretty close where we should be putting out a Debian
release of ncurses.
I'd like #556
19 matches
Mail list logo
