Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:43:17PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:26:33PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:14:54AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > Why is a pure virtual build-depends a serious bug? > > > Could you please point out the section of

Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-08 Thread Philip Brown
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:26:33PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:14:54AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Why is a pure virtual build-depends a serious bug? > > Could you please point out the section of policy? > > Forget the pure virtual bit - nothing in unstable provide

Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-06 Thread Daniel Schepler
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:48:54PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> >> > severity 169969 serious >> Bug#169969: acfax: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev >> Severity set to `serious'. >> >

Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:14:54AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:48:54PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > severity 169969 serious > > Bug#169969: acfax: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev > > Severit

Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-06 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:48:54PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > severity 169969 serious > Bug#169969: acfax: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev > Severity set to `serious'. > > > severity 170006 serious > Bug#170006: emacs20: Pu