Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #924011,
regarding wondershaper: README.Debian: Suggest using $IFACE in
/etc/network/interfaces reference
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 03:24:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095040: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #384536,
regarding wondershaper: add config scripts for /etc/network
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:59:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084746: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #550906,
regarding guessnet: Guessnet sees WPA2 network as open when wpa_supplicant is
authenticated to the network
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:59:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084746: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #397885,
regarding guessnet: /etc/network/interfaces parsing problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2024 22:56:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1079645: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #711002,
regarding ifscheme doesn't consider /etc/network/interfaces.d/
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:23:34 +0300
with message-id
and subject line no answer from submitter in 2 years, closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #818880,
regarding dhcpcd5: sometimes removes route to local network on wakeup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing control commands:
> reassign 989370 ifenslave
Bug #989370 [ifupdown] general: In bonding network configuration, hwaddress
crashes networking service, fails to restart
Bug reassigned from package 'ifupdown' to 'ifenslave'.
Ignoring request to alter found version
Sirs,
I installed Debian Stretch 9.11.0 on my laptops from Live lxde ISO,
which has only wicd as a network manager.
wicd didn't configure my wifi. I tried to, but failed.
Also, I am more familiar with Network Manager. So I proceeded to
remove wicd and installed network manager, creating
Your message dated Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:05:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523513: fixed in rdate 1:1.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #523513,
regarding rdate: should not set time if network delay is too big
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
berryPi model 4b
What led up to the situation?
I set up a new RaspberryPi to be a Samba network file server for an HFS
partition (see setup section at end of this email for details). I then deleted
about 300 files from the HFS partition from a client machine. This caused an
"Internal
Processing control commands:
> fixed 523513 upstream/1.10
Bug #523513 [rdate] rdate: should not set time if network delay is too big
The source upstream and version 1.10 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as fixed in versions upstream/1.10.
--
523513: https://bugs.debian.org/
Control: fixed 523513 upstream/1.10
Dear maintainer,
The suggested patch was applied in 1.10 version[1].
[1]
https://github.com/resurrecting-open-source-projects/openrdate/commit/45f494e9edcd2c78ea8bbe62e5f3daeff67c457e
Please, consider closing this bug in next Debian revision.
Regards,
Erib
Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:49:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#842199: fixed in autofs 5.1.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #842199,
regarding autofs should pull in network-online.target and nfs-client.target and
related issues
to be marked as done.
This means that
; /home/ via nfs4.
> The machine comes up but directories don't get mounted.
>
> For this to work properly we need several things to happen:
>
> 1) rpc.idmapd and rpc.gssd need to run
> 2) autofs needs to start up after the network is online
>
> Add the following line t
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #445287,
regarding doesn't report network error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:51:05 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Fwd: Bug#918013 closed by Willem van den Akker
(Bug#918013: fixed in vlan 2.0.4)
has caused the Debian Bug report #920493,
regarding vlan: missing executable bit on /etc/network/*/vlan
to be marked as done
Confirmed, this bug is affecting various newly-installed systems running Buster. It doesn't appear to have been an issue
before the end of last year however.
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:44:02 +0800 Gedalya wrote:
Package: vlan
Version: 2.0.3
Hello,
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan and /etc/ne
Package: vlan
Version: 2.0.3
Hello,
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan and /etc/network/if-post-down.d/vlan are now
installed without the 'x' bit set. This makes vlan interfaces in
/etc/network/interfaces useless.
Thanks,
Gedalya
Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2018 20:45:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#885826: fixed in linux-igd 1.0+cvs20070630-5+deb9u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #885826,
regarding linux-igd: /etc/init.d/linux-igd requires $network
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi Daniel
What is the state of the bug?
Add the following line to autofs.system
Not autofs.service ?
Best,
severity 792394 important
tags 792394 patch ipv6
Hi! I ran into this same problem. The patch
07-dual-family-transport.patch changed it to use host order instead of
network order when sending the UDP port number to the remote host.
Background: When a vtun client connects, it first connects on a
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:59:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#860516: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #852576,
regarding core-network: Update udevadm path
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:59:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#860516: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #799756,
regarding core-network: Privilege escalation via core-gui
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:59:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#860516: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #853355,
regarding core-network: ftbfs with GCC-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:48:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#728921: fixed in arpwatch 2.1a15-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #728921,
regarding arpwatch: default ignore a network
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Package: src:core-network
Version: 4.8-3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid buster
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-7
Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it
was filed for. If a fix in another package is required, please
file a bug for the other package (or
Package: core-network
Version: 4.8-3
Severity: normal
User: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: udevadm
Hi,
since Jessie, the udevadm binary is available as /bin/udevadm.
To not break existing scripts, which use the old /sbin/udevadm path,
the udev package currently ships a
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:00:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#839819: fixed in quagga 1.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #839819,
regarding quagga should not wait for network-online.target
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: quagga
Version: 1.0.20160315-2
The current rc script for quagga has "$network" as:
/etc/init.d/quagga:# Required-Start: $local_fs $network $remote_fs $syslog
/etc/init.d/quagga:# Required-Stop: $local_fs $network $remote_fs $syslog
systemd treats services having $
ote:
> > >
> > > > ndisc6 (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> > > > .
> > > >* QA upload.
> > > >* Set maintainer to the Debian QA Group (see #713004).
> > > >* Add conflicts between rdnssd and network-manager (clo
ing a default
configuration which is almost always broken, that requires considerable
tinkering to make it work properly (which I had done), and even more
tinkering to also make it return the appropriate exit code (which was not at
all apparent until network manager broke due to it).
Also, the way r
Processing control commands:
> clone -1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign -1 openresolv
Bug #813803 [network-manager] network-manager: Network-manager update to
1.1.90-4 in unstable broken if resolvconf enabled
Bug reassigned from package 'network-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 813803 network-manager
Bug #813803 [openresolv] restarting non-existing services leads to failure
Bug reassigned from package 'openresolv' to 'network-manager'.
No longer marked as found in versions openresolv/3.
Control: clone -1
Control: reassign -1 openresolv
Control: retitle -1 restarting non-existing services leads to failure
Control: found -1 3.7.2-1
Am 02/05/2016 um 07:00 PM schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 02/05/2016 um 06:26 PM schrieb Giacomo Mulas:
>> well, apparently either resolvconf does not wor
Hi Reiner,
Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Since the last upload, wicd-gtk unfortunately misses pixmaps
> used in the application (systray icon, signal strength indicators, etc.)
Thanks for the analysis! Will have a look at why this is missing later
this evening.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 wicd-gtk: pixmaps missing in package
Since the last upload, wicd-gtk unfortunately misses pixmaps
used in the application (systray icon, signal strength indicators, etc.)
See the debdiff below.
$ debdiff wicd-gtk_1.7.2.4-5_all.deb wicd-gtk_1.7.3-1_
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #811364 [wicd-gtk] wicd-gtk: status's icons -Status of wireless network-
doesnt show in the interface of Wicd
Severity set to 'normal' from 'minor'
> retitle -1 wicd-gtk: pixmaps missing in package
Bug #81136
Package: wicd-gtk
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of th
> > .
> > >* QA upload.
> > >* Set maintainer to the Debian QA Group (see #713004).
> > >* Add conflicts between rdnssd and network-manager (closes: #740998).
> >
> > This bug just hit me in Debian stable (as it happens, it appeared t
Hi,
Debian 5.0 is quite old. Are you stilll interested in this bug
report.
Jose Calhariz
--
--
O sono e muito mais aprazivel na cabana do pobre do que nos
perfumados palacios dos grandes.
-- William Shakespeare
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:36:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730168: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #481483,
regarding lastfmsubmitd: Doesn't know how to use a network proxy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:43:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#727142: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #563210,
regarding kerneloops: marks an oops as submitted, even though the network is
down
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:03:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678210: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #314522,
regarding qt3-dev-tools: uic attempts to connect to the network
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:53:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#653101: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #272469,
regarding Please make backup of /etc/network/interfaces
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi,
Is this issue still present in the latest version of Exaile (0.3.2.1)?
If so, could you please file a bug upstream at [1]?
Kind regards,
- Vincent
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/exaile/+filebug
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Hi,
...
> [7.077355] b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 478.104 (2008-07-01
> 00:50:23)
> [7.108439] input: ACPI Virtual Keyboard Device as
> /devices/virtual/input/input10
> [ 12.625470] b43-phy0 ERROR: Fatal DMA error: 0x0400, 0x,
> 0x, 0x, 0x, 0x0
Package: offlineimap
Version: 6.2.0.2-2
Severity: normal
I've been having what I believe is the same bug too. It used to
happen much more, but then I passed -1 -d imap as suggested above,
and it didn't crash for a few months. Before that change it crashed
about 5 times a month.
Eventually I got
Joey Hess wrote:
> [ I'd try to reproduce this with -d thread, but that causes an immediate
> crash on startup:
> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object ]
That happens with python 2.6. python 2.5 supports -d thread.
With python 2.6 I also don't seem to get an
it running for a while
while memory was ballooning, and then being ctrl-c'd. Included below, it was
spewing a lot of futex calls. Something to do with threading gone awry?
(maxsyncaccounts and maxconnections are both 1)
At the same time, tcpdump showed absolutely no network traffic. I
suspect t
Package: firmware-b43-lpphy-installer
Version: 4.174.64.19-4
Severity: normal
[6.856309] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/ucode15.fw
[6.889898] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/lp0initvals15.fw
[6.912802] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/lp0bsinitvals15.fw
[7.077355] b4
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:42:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#529984: fixed in openntpd 3.9p1+debian-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #529984,
regarding openntpd is restarted by /etc/network/if-up.d/openntpd even if not
enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:42:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#507586: fixed in openntpd 3.9p1+debian-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #507586,
regarding openntpd: ntpd starts before network is available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
sorry - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605579 is
the bugzilla url for the if-down.d bug.
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Mark Hedges wrote:
>
> Hi. Apologies for the mass mail, I'm writing because you
> maintain Debian packages that install scripts in
> /etc/network/if-
Hi. Apologies for the mass mail, I'm writing because you
maintain Debian packages that install scripts in
/etc/network/if-*.d/.
network-manager in Squeeze has broken the behavior of
scripts in these directories. Since it is the choice by
default in the default desktop, it seems important
Your message dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:59:31 GMT
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line laptop-netconf has been removed from Debian, closing #442917
has caused the Debian Bug report #442917,
regarding laptop-netconf: Purging laptop-netconf doesn't remove
/etc/network/inte
extension librar
ii libxtst6 2:1.0.3-1 X11 Testing -- Resource extension
x2x recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
When called with
ssh foreignhost -X x2x -west -to :0
it everything works fine, until the mouse is moved to the monitor of the
foreignhost and t
trator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ifplugd
Version: 0.26-2.1
Severity: important
If have a laptop with 2 network interfaces: eth0 (realtek Ethernet),
and eth1 (ipw2200).
I dist-upgraded from sarge to testing (etch). Everything seemed to work right
after u
We offer mass sending letters via e-mail service.
Low prices .
Bypassing through the spamfilters.
Contact Information:
icq: 355591743
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We offer mass sending letters via e-mail service.
Low prices .
Bypassing through the spamfilters.
Contact Information:
icq: 355591743
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We offer mass sending letters via e-mail service.
Low prices .
Bypassing through the spamfilters.
Contact Information:
icq: 355591743
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My last patch could remove /etc/network/interfaces file without checking if
a backup exists. This seems not to be correct since the user could do this
manually and then purge laptop-netconf which will remove interfaces and wont
be able to retrieve the backup file. The corrected patch solve this
Package: laptop-netconf
Version: 0.9.6.7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Purge laptop-netconf don't remove /etc/network/interfaces and not restore
original interfaces.bak. The attached patch correct this problem.
Thanks,
Matheus Morais
--- debian/postrm 2007-09-12 10:34:03.0
aantivirus anntivirus anttivirus antiivirus antivvirus antiviirus antivirrus
http://img444.imageshack.us/my.php?image=hrcc6.gif
album minutes ago Trent could
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
#334361 caused pppoeconf to make an invalid /etc/network/interfaces in
certain cases. I submitted two patches, one fixing the bug, and one to
take preca
Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
#334361 caused pppoeconf to make an invalid /etc/network/interfaces in
certain cases. I submitted two patches, one fixing the bug, and one to
take precautions against similar bugs being reintroduced, or even
already existing. The
ds the following lines at the end of
/etc/network/interfaces :
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet manual
It doesn't check whether the file already contains these directives,
thus breaking the file syntax with duplicates when pppoeconf is ran
several times.
--
Email.it, the professi
nf recommends:
ii locales 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: National Language (
-- no debconf information
The line "pre-up /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up" in /etc/network/interfaces
is not inserted by pppoeconf. Therefore, the network will be down at boot.
In my second system (Sarge) pppoeconf
: testing uptodate 3.5-4
sed: testing uptodate 4.1.4-5
whiptail-provider: not installed
whiptail: testing uptodate 0.51.6-31
locales: testing uptodate 2.3.6-3
xdialog: testing uptodate 2.2.0-1
When pppoeconf is executed, it adds the following lines at the end of
/etc/network/interfaces :
auto eth0
457
To: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#356561: pppoeconf: does not insert the pre-up line in
/etc/network/interfaces
X-Operating-System: Linux rincewind 2.6.10-kanotix-8
From: Axel N?tzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:27:39PM -0500, J
457
To: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#356561: pppoeconf: does not insert the pre-up line in
/etc/network/interfaces
X-Operating-System: Linux rincewind 2.6.10-kanotix-8
From: Axel N�tzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:51:35PM -0500, J
457
To: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#356561: pppoeconf: does not insert the pre-up line in
/etc/network/interfaces
X-Operating-System: Linux rincewind 2.6.10-kanotix-8
From: Axel N�tzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:51:35PM -0500, J
gt; On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 07:39:06PM +0100, Axel N??tzold wrote:
> > > > > The line "pre-up /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up" in
> > > > > /etc/network/interfaces
> > > > > is not inserted by pppoeconf. Therefore, the network will be down at
&g
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Axel N�tzold wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:06:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 07:39:06PM +0100, Axel N??tzold wrote:
> > > The line "pre-up /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up" in /etc/network/interfa
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 07:39:06PM +0100, Axel N??tzold wrote:
> The line "pre-up /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up" in /etc/network/interfaces
> is not inserted by pppoeconf. Therefore, the network will be down at boot.
> In my second system (Sarge) pppoeconf make that properly.
&
y: National Language (
-- no debconf information
The line "pre-up /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up" in /etc/network/interfaces
is not inserted by pppoeconf. Therefore, the network will be down at boot.
In my second system (Sarge) pppoeconf make that properly.
Furthermore, if pppoeconf will be used a
(sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 28
Apr 2004 12:22:17 -0300
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:22:17 -0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless-newhost doesn't process or copy my /etc/network/interfaces
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Nicolau Werneck <[E
Thomsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless-image-simple: loopback network device not configured
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:18:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: diskless-image-simple
Version: N/A
ri, 17 Jun 2005 01:54:06 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gfpoken: Unable to play network games
X-Mailer: rep
Package: gfpoken
Severity: important
The accept function is called with an uninitialised argument. Therefore,
it fails. This makes network play impossible. The fix is pretty easy.
I plan to take over maintainance of this package and fix the bug with
the next upload.
Reproduce:
- start 2
Account Status: Awaiting Verification
Approved:Yes
Interest:4.0
Client ID: 0383504
Above is your m o rt gage / re f i n ance information.
Your info has been processed but we are waiting
for you to complete our company finalization form.
http://www.olmaretad.com/
T
Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.17
I tried to create this file:
_imgdir_/root/usr/lib/diskless-image/template/etc/network/interfaces
It gets copied when I execute diskless-newhost to create a new host, but
if I execute it to reconfigure a host that already exists, the file does
not get copied
ED]
Subject: discover network doesn't work any more
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: scotty
Version: 4:00-02-21-1
using tkined1.5.0, ip di
Expand Your Universe on the Research Network.
Research Network is a job site devoted exclusively to professional Researchers
and companies who need Researchers. It doesn't matter what industry you
specialize in. Research Network encompasses a broad spectrum of industries and
we contin
Expand Your Universe on the Research Network.
Research Network is a job site devoted exclusively to professional Researchers
and companies who need Researchers. It doesn't matter what industry you
specialize in. Research Network encompasses a broad spectrum of industries and
we contin
I have installed the testing release of debian gnu linux with linuxconf as
the only additional package (including linuxconf requered packages).
The problem is that if i go into the basic tcp/ip networking screen and
change from dhcp lookup to manual configuration and enter all the ip
information t
85 matches
Mail list logo
