Philippe Grégoire wrote:
> From what I understood from an earlier bug report, these
> changes were made due to not reproducible builds.
No, they are completely unrelated.
I'll explain below.
Mason Larobina wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
> I'm the upstream.
>
> What is this 'ugh' patch?
The "ugh" patch
.. forgot to reply to the list
Hi,
Sorry I couldn't reply sooner.
apt-get source luakitls luakit-/debian/patches/
Nice software, btw. :)
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 21:53:59 -0400
Subject: Re: Bug#790324: luakit: Improve security level, dubious features
From: mason.larob...@gmail.com
To: g
Hi Philippe,
I'm the upstream.
What is this 'ugh' patch?
The other points you raise are valid. I'll look into them when I get some
time this week.
Thanks.
On 27 June 2015 at 21:27, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
> Package: luakit
> Version: 2012.09.13-r1-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
Package: luakit
Version: 2012.09.13-r1-4
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Looking at globals.lua, I was considering that the low level of security was
due to the (somewhat) aged package. Now, looking at the changes applied by the
'ugh' patch, I see some of these artifacts are not provided upstr
4 matches
Mail list logo
