Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-1
I attach the trivial solution for the bug: the library header
cuneiform.h is packaged as libcuneiform-dev.deb
Please consider for inclusion.
Perhaps it also makes sense to split "cuneiform" package into
"cuneiform" (binary only) and "libcuneiform" (.so only) and update the
Jakub Wilk wrote on 01.10.2010 13:11:
> Why do you need a static library in the first place?
There is an intention to reduce the number of 3-rd party dependencies
(e.g. use static linking is possible) to:
* make the results of recognition robust to changes in these libraries,
so the results are re
* Dmitry Katsubo , 2010-10-01, 12:47:
I have fired a request at cuneiform bugtracker:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cuneiform-linux/+bug/652883
I hope .a will be available as well (usually it is not a big deal).
Why do you need a static library in the first place?
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
D
On 30.09.2010 21:14, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Fixing this bug is non-trivial and I don't currently have time to work
> on it. However, I will be happy to accept a patch if you provide one.
As it uses cmake, it is not trivial for me.
At least one can include which is installed.
I have fired a request
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 598616 + confirmed help
Bug #598616 [cuneiform] cuneiform: development package is needed
Added tag(s) confirmed and help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598616: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
tags 598616 + confirmed help
thanks
Fixing this bug is non-trivial and I don't currently have time to work
on it. However, I will be happy to accept a patch if you provide one.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: cuneiform
Version: 0.7.0+dfsg.1-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to have also a development package for this project
(e.g. cuneiform-dev) that includes:
- Static library(-ies) (*.a)
- Necessary headers (*.h)
Thanks in advance!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ
7 matches
Mail list logo
