Luk Claes (l...@debian.org) wrote:
> Well, stable won't be touched till the point release so until the point
> release it will stay this broken I'm afraid. At the point release we can
> choose to either remove the package or fix the package (small targeted
> diff). Do you think the latter is not p
Angel Ortega wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> Luk Claes (l...@debian.org) wrote:
>
>> It could be fixed in a point release, though only with a targeted fix
>> (no new upstream version).
>
> Though I understand the reasoning, this does not change the truth: the
> über-old version in Le
Thanks for the quick response.
Luk Claes (l...@debian.org) wrote:
> It could be fixed in a point release, though only with a targeted fix
> (no new upstream version).
Though I understand the reasoning, this does not change the truth: the
über-old version in Lenny can break things. This may cause
Angel Ortega wrote:
> (Note: I'm upstream author for the mped package).
>
> Lenny has been released containing a version of the Minimum Profit text
> editor that is from 2005 and that can cause severe information lossage due
> to an incorrect handling of UTF-8 encoding.
>
> An RC bug was filed (
Package: mped
Version: 3.3.17-1
Severity: critical
Tags: lenny
(Note: I'm upstream author for the mped package).
Lenny has been released containing a version of the Minimum Profit text
editor that is from 2005 and that can cause severe information lossage due
to an incorrect handling of UTF-8 enc
5 matches
Mail list logo
