On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> Thanks for this!
>
> This package is orphened though, what can we do about that?
>
> I would like to see a new upload with your patch.
I can do an upload tomorrow, seeing that I did the last upload.
(I suspect it was broken before th
On 2008-09-13 23:03 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I can do an upload tomorrow, seeing that I did the last upload.
> (I suspect it was broken before that, though)
The previous maintainer apparently had built the package with
debian/devil2dict being executable, so the bug did only show up after
Thanks for this!
This package is orphened though, what can we do about that?
I would like to see a new upload with your patch.
Best,
--
Noah Slater, http://bytesexual.org/nslater
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
tags 498829 + patch
thanks
On 2008-09-13 17:17 +0200, Noah Slater wrote:
> Package: dict-devil
> Version: 1.0-9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This package does not contain any dictionary entries.
Indeed. I built the package and got this log:
,
| [...]
| f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 498829 + patch
Bug#498829: dict-devil does not contain any entries
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Package: dict-devil
Version: 1.0-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package does not contain any dictionary entries.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experim
6 matches
Mail list logo
