tag 454212 - unreproducible
tag 454212 + patch
thanks
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:21:01PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> However, the original problem is on i386 and happens earlier in the
> initialization code. I can't reproduce it myself, but I think it might
> well be caused by the sprintf overflow
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 454212 - unreproducible
Bug#454212: megahal segfaults as soon as it's launched
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> tag 454212 + patch
Bug#454212: megahal segfaults as soon as it's launched
There were no tags
Hello,
* Niko Tyni [Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:08:12AM +0200]:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:18:37AM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Niko Tyni wrote:
> > >>Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output
> > >>of megahal and strace.
> > >
> > >The attached patch fixes a stack co
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:18:37AM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Niko Tyni wrote:
> >>Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output
> >>of megahal and strace.
> >
> >The attached patch fixes a stack corruption issue on 64-bit architectures
> >(reading 8 bytes into a 4-byte
Niko Tyni wrote:
Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output
of megahal and strace.
The attached patch fixes a stack corruption issue on 64-bit architectures
(reading 8 bytes into a 4-byte buffer) and an off-by-one sprintf overflow
in the error and status file name in
> Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output
> of megahal and strace.
The attached patch fixes a stack corruption issue on 64-bit architectures
(reading 8 bytes into a 4-byte buffer) and an off-by-one sprintf overflow
in the error and status file name initialization cod
6 matches
Mail list logo
