Bug#292242: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#292242: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered]]]

2005-01-26 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:01:12AM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > Relicensed manpages for snacc (from GFDL to GPL) attached; somebody > from QA to do an upload or should I do it myself ? Just do it yourself. If this isn't possible due to time or other constraints, I would be happy to help out, th

Bug#292242: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#292242: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered]]]

2005-01-26 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:01:12AM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > Relicensed manpages for snacc (from GFDL to GPL) attached; somebody > from QA to do an upload or should I do it myself ? Cool! You can upload yourself, just upload mentionioning "QA Upload" and use a regular maintainer version num

Bug#292242: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#292242: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered]]]

2005-01-26 Thread Frederic Peters
Relicensed manpages for snacc (from GFDL to GPL) attached; somebody from QA to do an upload or should I do it myself ? Regards, Frederic --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:30:22PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > Would you mind relicensing berdecode and snacc-config under t

Bug#292242: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered

2005-01-25 Thread Bernhard R. Link
Package: snacc Version: 1.3bbn-6 Severity: serious The following manpages say they are only distributeable under the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this license: berdecode.1.gz snacc-config.1.gz This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to debian-devel