Hi,
Ask Panthera on IRC. He had expressed interest in adopting minit IIRC.
He had actuall promised me a reply by April 6th...
best regards,
Erich Schubert
--
erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C(o_
There is no branch of mathematics, however abstract, which may
On Wed, April 5, 2006 23:20, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Erich, will you request removal from unstable, or do you want me to do
> I had someone who mentioned interest in maintaining minit once, I think
> this year, and way past I had orphaned it. I'll ask him if he still wants
> to become the
Hi,
> Erich, will you request removal from unstable, or do you want me to do
I had someone who mentioned interest in maintaining minit once, I think
this year, and way past I had orphaned it. I'll ask him if he still
wants to become the new maintainer.
I'm not sure I have his email, it was on IRC,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 263358
Bug#263358: minit: Minit not to be included in sarge, experimental packaging
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
reopen 263358
thanks
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 14:04 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> As it stands, this package will move to testing. Do you really want
> that to happen? I think an RC bug about "don't move to sarge" should
> remain RC even after sarge released, unless someone agreeing to
> maintain t
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:45:39PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
> > There's of course the question whether it should be removed altogether
> > since it's orphaned, but that's a different one, and I don't see a
> > pressing reason for that (there are a handful of users and no bugs).
>
> A cou
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 19:45 +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
> > There's of course the question whether it should be removed altogether
> > since it's orphaned, but that's a different one, and I don't see a
> > pressing reason for that (there are a handful of users and no bugs).
>
> A couple of
Hi,
> There's of course the question whether it should be removed altogether
> since it's orphaned, but that's a different one, and I don't see a
> pressing reason for that (there are a handful of users and no bugs).
A couple of installations doesn't mean they ever bothered to configure
it.
I thin
8 matches
Mail list logo
