On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:30:56 +0200
Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 08:27:01PM +0200, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
>
> > Can you send me if you have the time the result of :
> > 1- On Nedit binary (from binary package) :
> > strings nedit
> > nm -D -S nedit
> > 2-
hello,
Can you send me if you have the time the result of :
1- On Nedit binary (from binary package) :
strings nedit
nm -D -S nedit
2- On lesstif2 library package :
nm -D -S libXm.so.2.0.1
Regards.
Alexandre
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:28:15 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott) wrote:
> I do not think I should have multiple versions of the source
> headers unless the packages are bad, but this still does not explain the
> problem I am seeing with the distribution package.
No, it doesn't explain it. The dist
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 08:48:33PM +0200, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When you have reported this bug against Nedit, have you build the binary
> from sources?
> The lesstif usptream author suspects that this issue can be related to having
> several versions of include files and lib
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:46:36 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott) wrote:
> I decided to try building nedit myself to investigate further. After
> trying a few different things, it seems that if I build it with the
> lesstif-dev package installed instead of lesstif2-dev I don't get this
> message:
>
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:44:27 +0200
Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually I've awaited further input which I got today,
> but this issue has come around in November as well.
>
> At the time I worked with the person who had the problem,
> and by cleanly recompiling nedit and LessTif, th
6 matches
Mail list logo
