On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:32:55AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 12:33:04AM +, Andrew Bower wrote:
> >
> > Surely it depends - some thing are highly distro-specific. The amount of
> > detritus that accumulates in upstream contrib directories over the
> > years... s
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 12:33:04AM +, Andrew Bower wrote:
>
> Surely it depends - some thing are highly distro-specific. The amount of
> detritus that accumulates in upstream contrib directories over the
> years... scripts that new integrators would surely rather rewrite for
> their own contex
Thanks for the review, Chris!
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 11:52:08PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> ISTM this is a lot of new, potentially fragile sh code, possibly
> with undefined semantics. Indeed shellcheck has a lot of things to
> say, including:
>
> | In prune-logs line 9:
> | set -o pipefa
* Andrew Bower [250203 23:39]:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 09:24:31PM +, Andrew Bower wrote:
> > wtmpdb will rotate logs but nothing will prune them (like logrotate would
> > for
> > other types of log - unfortunately it doesn't fit in well with the wtmpdb
> > way).
Control: tags -1 patch
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 09:24:31PM +, Andrew Bower wrote:
> wtmpdb will rotate logs but nothing will prune them (like logrotate would for
> other types of log - unfortunately it doesn't fit in well with the wtmpdb
> way).
I have come up with a solution whereby a 'prune
Package: wtmpdb
Version: 0.13.0-5
Severity: normal
wtmpdb will rotate logs but nothing will prune them (like logrotate would for
other types of log - unfortunately it doesn't fit in well with the wtmpdb way).
Also logs shouldn't be in a state directory like /var/lib. We can forgive the
live datab
6 matches
Mail list logo
