Hi Lionel,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:48:16PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >>> To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
> >>> 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
> >>> against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
>
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:48:16 +0200
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> (Please CC me on replies, as I'm quite behind on reading MLs. M-F-T
> set accordingly.)
From the bug report:
> In the unusual case that your
> package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the
> dependency_libs part
(Please CC me on replies, as I'm quite behind on reading MLs. M-F-T
set accordingly.)
Taking this discussion out of bug#633256 and into debian-devel.
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 11:13:47PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 23:06:03 +0200 Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 09, 2
3 matches
Mail list logo