From the developer, Darren Salt:
https://github.com/dsalt/devilspie2/issues/11#issuecomment-242428
'"Just had another poke at this… /looks like/ emacs is doing things to
the window shortly after opening it, and that's conflicting with what
devilspie2 is told to do.
Waiting for a short ti
Source: goldencheetah
Version: 1:3.5-6
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
Build fails here:
g++ -c -pipe -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-sign-compare -g -O2
-ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -Wformat -Werror=format-security
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time
-D_
The failure to build elpa-cider is caused by:
> In toplevel form:
> cider.el:218:1: Error: Wrong number of arguments: (3 . 4), 2
In the source, this corresponds to:
> (define-obsolete-variable-alias 'cider-default-repl-command
> 'cider-jack-in-default)
In recent versions of emacs, the definiti
Thank you for maintaining the wfinnish and wswedish Debian packages.
/usr/share/dict/finnish
and
/usr/share/dict/swedish
seem to use ISO-8859 encoding instead of UTF-8.
Is this deliberate?
Thank you.
David
Unit 193 writes:
>
> Actually at the time of this writing, 4.7 is the current release. I had
> gone ahead and jumped to the latest version a while ago, mainly to unify
> my system on one Lua version, and I've attached the debdiff (debian/ only)
> to this message.
>
Hi all;
I've orphaned the
h the file was reintroduced.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ David da Silva Polverari
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian: The universal operating system
⠈⠳⣄
this when installing on various models of
Macbook Pro.
Thank you
David
[0]
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.0
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, &#
###
* Debian Stable (devilspie2_0.43-4_amd64.deb) + MATE installed from tasksel
* Works!: Open GNOME. Open $ devilspie in the terminal. Open
emacs. It actually opens maximized!*
Note that MATE is required. Without MATE: Debian Stable
(devilspie
Package: devilspie2
Version: 0.42
###
Affected devilspie2 commands
The command that I'm describing in the sections below is maximize(). However,
I've also failed with these maximize* commands for Emacs:
- maximize_horizontally()
- maximize_vertically()
#
Dave Anglin
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
on Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David (Plasma) Paul"
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 21:48:17 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Fix #678437 and simplify debian/rules
---
debian/changelog | 31 +++
debian/control | 10 +-
debian/mp3blas
This problem is likely caused by a lack of support for anything newer than
TLS 1.0 in C-Kermit regardless of which version of OpenSSL it's built with.
I've fixed this in C-Kermit for Windows which connects to telnetd-ssl in
sid just fine negotiating a TLS 1.3 connection. I expect this change, alon
Package: emscripten
Version: 3.1.6~dfsg-5
Severity: normal
It is well-known (or quickly becomes known) that if you pass --closure=1 to
emcc, you will run up against the issue that Debian's closure-compiler was
last updated in 2013. However, if you download your own copy of the jar you
can use JAVA
Proposed fix here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996680
Package: alien
Version: 8.95
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: dd...@cpan.org
Dear Maintainer,
Attempting to convert a aarch64 rpm to arm64 deb led to the following error:
foobar-1.00.0-1.el7.aarch64.rpm is for architecture aarch64 ; the package
cannot be built on this system
When the below patc
Roger Leigh writes:
>
> The PAM auth and session handling is I think the most likely culprit,
> and this is not under our direct control. Is there a particular PAM
> module which can change these cpusets? If so, can you edit the
> schroot PAM configuration and see if it can be disabled this way?
Package: schroot
Version: 1.6.10-11+b1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As you can see with session below, schroot throws away the processor
affinities present in the parent process. This breaks a common
strategy (used e.g. by slurm) for sharing multi-processor ma
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> But it wasn't clear to me, a humble QA uploader barely familiar with
> emacs, XEmacs, and .el files at all, weather it is required to work with
> XEmacs or how I would figure that out.
The last time I checked, the basic technology used by dh-elpa (namely
'package.el'
Attempt to fix here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975353
Control: severity -1 normal
David Bremner writes:
> flush has been deprecated for a while. It looks like it has finally gone a
> away?
>
> /etc/cron.weekly/apt-xapian-index:
That turned out to be a corrupted install python3-xapian on my machine
(installing xapian 1.5 in /usr, oop
Package: apt-xapian-index
Version: 0.51
Severity: important
Tags: newcomer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
flush has been deprecated for a while. It looks like it has finally gone a away?
/etc/cron.weekly/apt-xapian-index:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/upda
Hi Simon & folx,
thanks for preparing those patches. I applied both to a local compile and
have not experienced a crash of discord in the timeframe I would have
expected several. Thanks a lot for preparing this!
Cheers, David
I have created a QA upload with this patch and one for #945797, and
have sent a request for sponsorship to debian-mentors. If anyone here
wants to sponsor, I’d be very glad.
Cheers,
David
Forwarded Message
Subject: Bug#946965: RFS: sendmail/8.15.2-16 [QA] -- powerful
Package: opendkim-tools
Version: 2.11.0~alpha-12
The MT_SMTPREPLY case in mt_eom_check prints two possibly-NULL char
pointers via format string %s. This triggers undefined behaviour. On my
machine, these pointers are printed as the string ‘(null)’. In any case
this distorts the test result.
The a
Package: opendkim-tools
Version: 2.11.0~alpha-12
The implementation of mt.data() is broken. The state management uses the
wrong constants, thereby causing any use of mt.data() to time out:
miltertest: select(): timeout on fd 3
The fix is straightforward. Align the mistaken use of STATE_* constan
Below is a first sketch for a patch (= works for me).
I’ve tried to solve it with an additional patch in debian/patches. The
library path, and the library name, description, and version are still
hard-coded in milter.pc, they would need to be substituted in from
somewhere. Perhaps it would be bett
Correction: the version in milter.pc should rather be the milter library
version 1.0.1, not the sendmail version 8.15.2.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
/lcms2/blob/master/lcms2.pc.in
So those are the pieces. If someone familiar with the libmilter build
could help integrate it, I would be very grateful.
Thank you,
David
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: libmilter-dev
Version: 8.15.2-15
The libmilter-dev package does not include a pkg-config metadata file,
and so cannot be used out of the box with pkg-config.
$ pkg-config --libs milter
Package milter was not found in the pkg-config search path.
...
Often (usually?) library development f
On 28/11/2019 14:00, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 28/11/2019 13.39, David Bürgin wrote:
>> Given all this, I want to propose changing the log level of this message
>> to debug (SMI_LOG_DEBUG), guarded by ‘if (dbg > 0)’ as elsewhere.
>
> Your reasoning sounds plausible.
Package: libmilter-dev
Version: 8.15.2-15
Every time a milter exits a log message like the following appears in
syslog:
Nov 26 11:35:22 buster my_milter[13781]: my_milter: mi_stop=1
This message is logged at info level, but it looks like a debug message:
it refers to the internal function name ‘
. As a
result both flavours are installed, and Alternatives selects the GTK+2 one.
I'll report this bug.
> If you're going to fix the package I won't push for removal.
It would be great if it could be delayed until this is sorted out.
Regards,
David Hart
s doesn't work because configure
>assumes GTK2.
>
>It looks like a newer upstream version addresses this as
>https://wiki.codelite.org/pmwiki.php/Main/ReleaseNotesCodeLite13 says:
>
>| Make CodeLite compile and run against GTK3
>
>I think upgrading to a new major upstream
Hi, CodeLite 12.0 was released almost a year ago (February 23, 2018) but the
version which is available in Debian Testing at the moment is CodeLite 10.
When will the recent version of CodeLite be available on the Testing repository?
-David
Source: twitter-bootstrap
Severity: wishlist
Please, drop me from d/control and d/copyright. I don’t even seem to
have write access to the repository in order to do it myself.
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: gnome-shell-extension-weather
Version: 0~20160325.gitb5415ec-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Tried to configure open weather extension for UK standard barometric pressure
unit of millibars, as used in public weather forecasts.
* What exactly di
Package: timidity-el
Version: 2.14.0-2
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Preparing to unpack .../timidity-el_2.14.0-2_all.deb ...
ERROR: timidity-el is broken - called emacs-package-remove as a new-style
add-on, but has no compat file.
Remove timidity-el for emacs
ctly to let the
luakit package become available inside the Debian archive.
Someone can verify that, just to assure that I'm in the right way.
Thanks.
--
DAVID Grégory
Libre Software Developer
d...@groolot.net
https://framagit.org/groolot
https://github.com/groolot
smime.p7s
Description:
Package: a2ps
Version: 1:4.14-3
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The .el files are in the binary package, but I guess the postinst
doesn't follow debian emacs policy to get the files byte compiled and
installed in the right place.
- -- System Information:
Debian R
eally nice.
Cheers.
--
DAVID Grégory
Libre Software Developer
d...@groolot.net
https://framagit.org/groolot
https://github.com/groolot
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017, Mason Larobina wrote:
Heya folks, the luakit repo has been updated to use webkit2, see the notice
at https://luakit.github.io/luakit/
On Sat, 1 J
Package: syslinux-utils
Version: 5.00+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I've followed the instructions at
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch04s03.html.en section
4.3.3 (essentially
http://hyper.to/blog/link/debian-installer-on-a-usb-ke
Package: xcolorsel
Version: 1.1a-20
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
The build fails here:
gcc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -Aa
-D_HPUX_SOURCE-Dlinux -D__hppa__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
Package: live-build
Version: 1:20151215
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
live-build is supposed to delete the temporary '_LB_LOCAL_KEY_EMAIL'
signing key at the end of the 'scripts/build/chroot_archives' script.
However, it fails because the 'apt-key del' command expects a key ID and
(cyrus) and deliver mail by hand, so I know the imap server is
working. I'm not sure how to debug sendmail though. Nothing in strace is
giving me any clues.
-David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
required to exist? If so, why
wasn't it there? What does it do?
-David
-- Package-specific info:
Output of /usr/share/bug/sendmail/script:
sendmail.conf:
DAEMON_NETMODE="Static";
DAEMON_NETIF="eth0";
DAEMON_MODE="Daemon";
DAEMON_PARMS=""
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 Unsuitable for stable without proper maintenance
Control: block -2 by 766449
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:08:53PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-09-18 11:36, "David Prévot" wrote:
> At least this "workaround" seems
Hey,
Hope you are doing well!
We want to help you to grow your business fast.
Our email marketing services can generate you more sales and leads.
We can grow your business sales 2-3 times than what it is now.
Let me know if you are interested to hear more.
Thanks,
David Lewis
Contact: ur
Hey,
Can we talk today?
Are you interested in using our email marketing and lead generation
solutions?
We can grow your business sales 2-4 times than what it is now.
Let me know if you are interested to hear more.
Best regards,
David North
Contact: gbem...@sina.com
Hi,
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:23:24 -0400 David =?UTF-8?Q?Pr=C3=A9vot?=
> wrote:
>> unarchive 784859
>> # Rebuilding is a workaround, it does *not* address the problem.
>> reopen 784859
>
> AFAICT rebuilding with an updated toolchain actually got rid of the
> st
Control: retitle -1 Uninstallable in Sid: too strict version constraints
Control: tags -1 sid stretch
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 12:57:29PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Package: ampache-common
> Version: 3.6-rzb2752+dfsg-5
> The version constraint for php-getid3 (<< 1.9.8.0~) is to
Package: ampache-common
Version: 3.6-rzb2752+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
The version constraint for php-getid3 (<< 1.9.8.0~) is too strict for no
good reason. Since 1.9.9+dfsg-2 is in Sid, the package is not
installable anymore. Maybe dh_linktree is not as useful as it looks.
Regards
sh/tools/web_config/jquery.js
stat: cannot stat '/usr/share/fish/tools/web_config/jquery.js': No such file or
directory
```
See also https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/1847
Thanks,
David Adam
zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-re
It looks like:-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078057
I am hitting it on a UEFI disk /dev/sda1, which is mounted as /boot/efi
The RedHat bug says this is a regression introduced in dosfstools-3.0.26. It
seems to work with dosfstools-3.0.25.
I am running 3.0.26-4.
David
--
To
Package: pristine-tar
Version: 1.32
Severity: normal
how to reproduce:
# or start from download.racket-lang.org
% wget
http://mirror.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/mirror/racket/6.1/racket-6.1-src.tgz
% git init pt-test
% cd pt-test && git commit -m'' --allow-empty
# from git-buildpackage ; saves m
Source: kst
Version: 2.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140926 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering d
Source: freeimage
Version: 3.15.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140926 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -shared
I'm experiencing this problem on opensuse with 13.1 when it didn't happen in
12.1
The problem for me appears to be when pristine-tar rebuilds the recreatetarball
eg:
pristine-tar: tar cf /tmp/pristine-tar.wsZp1jHqd3/recreatetarball --owner 0
--group 0 --numeric-owner -C /tmp/pristine-tar.wsZp
Source: hfsutils
Version: 3.2.6-12
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140628 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Unpack source
Source: xenwatch
Version: 0.5.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debi
Source: canna
Version: 3.7p3-12
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enterin
Source: socks4-server
Version: 4.3.beta2-18
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: bzr-fastimport
Version: 0.13.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]
Source: pygresql
Version: 1:4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140315 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-g
Source: python-repoze.who
Version: 1.0.18-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140208 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: python-repoze.what
Version: 1.0.9-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140208 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> runn
Source: wdm
Version: 1.28-16
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131226 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add the needed build depend.
ransient multiarch
issue, or maybe did I miss something obvious. Could you please provide a
way to reproduce it?
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 05:43:12PM +0100, David Suárez wrote:
> Source: ovito
> Version: 0.9.5-2
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
Just for the record: I’m looking at packaging the latest upstream
version (2.2.0), and will push the r
actually part of python-sprox, reassigning.
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Source: ovito
Version: 0.9.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131128 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: nitpic
Version: 0.1-14
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131128 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Due to the switch of libiberty to his own pack
ons of the configuration but
without success. It looks as if the configuration directive
GnuTLSEnable on
is just completely ignored.
cheers,
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'
Source: libpam-unix2
Version: 1:2.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131006 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: gpointing-device-settings
Version: 1.5.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131006 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: upse
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130922 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/r
Source: mcs
Version: 0.7.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130922 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: awffull
Version: 3.10.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130922 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
back in the dev package and are no longer renamed .3blt. I
can't see anything in the more recent changelog entries that would
suggest that this is deliberate.
Cheers,
David.
On 13/09/13 07:10, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Package: blt-dev,libgraphviz-dev
> Version: blt-dev/2.4z-6
> Versi
Package: fortunes
Version: 1:1.99.1-4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Typo in /usr/share/games/fortunes/computers (emnity instead of enmity)
Patch follows:
==
--- computers 2010-07-13 17:54:05.0 +0200
+++ computers_fixed 2013-07-30 19:51:19.830294934 +0200
@@ -2368,7 +2368,
Source: twitter-bootstrap
Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130726 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Package: libkwnn-dev
Version: 1.1.1~a021+cvs20100325-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts, broken-symlink, broken-symlink-shared-library
Hi,
During a test with piuparts, I noticed your package is
responsible for the presence of broken symlinks involving
a shared
Package: libwnn-dev
Version: 1.1.1~a021+cvs20100325-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts, broken-symlink, broken-symlink-shared-library
Hi,
During a test with piuparts, I noticed your package is
responsible for the presence of broken symlinks involving
a shared
Package: libcwnn-dev
Version: 1.1.1~a021+cvs20100325-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts, broken-symlink, broken-symlink-shared-library
Hi,
During a test with piuparts, I noticed your package is
responsible for the presence of broken symlinks involving
a shared
Source: libcdaudio
Version: 0.99.12p2-12
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
Source: xdemorse
Version: 1.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the offendin
Source: gtkglextmm
Version: 1.2.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++: fatal error: no inp
Source: mssh
Version: 1.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -pt
Source: prelink
Version: 0.0.20090925-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -D
Source: lightspeed
Version: 1.2a-9
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -
Source: ifrit
Version: 3.3.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the offending
Source: l7-filter-userspace
Version: 0.12-beta1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -DHAVE
Source: gdome2
Version: 0.8.1+debian-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/bash ../../libto
Source: ddccontrol
Version: 0.4.2-10
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Maybe you need to add explicitly the off
Package: xtermset
Version: 0.5.2-5
Tags: patch
https://buildd.debian.org/~brlink/packages/x/xtermset.html warns that
it overrunns array bounds. Looking at the code, it defines a couple
arrays as c[2] and then writes to c[2], so there's a clear problem
here. It's confusing what they get indexed on,
order to figure out the best course of action
(the translation may deserve an update since it was submitted almost
eight years ago, sorry no one replied to you until now).
1: http://translationproject.org/domain/gtkam.html
2: http://translationproject.org/team/pt.html
Regards
Control: reassign -1 python-numpy
Control: affects -1 python-scientific
Control: retitle -1 ABI change in 1.6.1 version
Hi,
Le 10/09/2012 04:32, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 16:59:13 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>>>>>> Le 27/08/2012 19:03,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
Le 29/08/2012 08:27, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>> Le 27/08/2012 19:03, David Prévot a écrit :
>>
>>> Could you please trigger a rebuild, to make the package work again
>>> (fixing
loses:
#685812)"
Regards
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Ker
Package: phoronix-test-suite
Version: 3.8.0-1
architecture: i386
david@Miho:~$ dpkg -l | grep freeglut3-dev
ii freeglut3-dev:i386
2.6.0-4 OpenGL Utility Toolkit development files
david@Miho:~$
david@Miho:~$ phoronix-test-suite benchmark lightsmark
The following
+ * Lintian fixes
+
+ -- David Steele Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:30:09 -0400
+
sgml-data (2.0.6) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
diff -ur sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/control sgml-data-2.0.7/debian/control
--- sgml-data-2.0.6.orig/debian/control 2011-11-02 22:14:48.124000413 -0400
+++ sgml-data
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
