Bug#229595: unicode/utf-8 support desperately missing

The problem becomes worse: Fortunately, with etch Debian becomes UTF-8 by default, but neither a2ps nor enscript can handle it. cedilla needs nearly 12 MB of CLisp plus 25 MB TeX stuff, which makes it a little bit heavy-weight, but at least it works... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#307760: snacc: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'EOC' was not declared in this scope

Quoting Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In case somebody is interested in snacc: Most of the bugs are supposed > to be fixed in Ubuntu. > > http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/snacc/ Thanks, if nobody else is faster I'll upload in some days. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#277690: Please apply proposed fix

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > Even though the original codebase might be unclean, and it is uncertain > whether snacc should be replaced by eSnacc, I don't see any reason why > this proposed bugfix is not applied to make the package build. > > Other packages have b

Bug#277690: snacc: FTBFS patch

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:10:47AM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote: > turn up the gcc warning level and clean up the code base. Is this > code maintained upstream? Yes and no. A new version is maintained as "eSnacc" (enhanced snacc), but it's very different from the original snacc. Partly because