Control: tags -1 + patch
On 2024-03-07 18:49 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: wv
> Version: 1.2.9-6.1
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Sven Joachim , Steve Langasek
>
>
> After renaming the libwv-1.2-4 library package to libwv-1.2-4t64, the
> /usr/share/d
Package: wv
Version: 1.2.9-6.1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Sven Joachim , Steve Langasek
After renaming the libwv-1.2-4 library package to libwv-1.2-4t64, the
/usr/share/doc/wv symlink has become dangling.
,
| $ file /usr/share/doc/wv
| /usr/share/doc/wv: broken symbolic link to libwv
Source: directfb
Version: 1.7.7-11.1~exp1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: Sven Joachim , Michael Hudson-Doyle
, Steve Langasek
The experimental upload of directfb FTBFS on all architectures[1],
because debian/libdirectfb-1.7-7t64.install is supposed to be run by
dh-exec, but is
On 2023-12-05 23:03 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:ap-utils
> Version: 1.5-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
>
> [snip]
>
> The above is just how the build ends and not necessarily th
Source: autoconf
Version: 2.71-3
This package uses the stage1 build profile, which is deprecated
according to https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec. It probably
ought to use the nodoc profile instead, and also tag the build
dependencies accordingly.
See #737936 for the reason why the profile
On 2023-01-08 02:56 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-01-07 20:05:59 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> >> If not, you may have been bitten by bug #1019554 in
>> >> anacron which needs manual restore as mentioned in
>> >> https://lists.debian.org/debi
On 2023-01-07 19:48 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-01-07 19:20:56 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2023-01-07 18:53 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> > zira:~> ll /var/lib/dlocate
>> > total 109172
>> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 55750318 2022-11-25 00
On 2023-01-07 18:53 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: dlocate
> Version: 1.12
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> dlocate cannot find recent files, so it is mostly useless.
>
> I suspect that since the upgrade to dlocate 1.12 on 2022-11-25,
> its database is no l
This is likely due to ncurses including format string annotations.
Indeed. The fix for the error is quite simple, add "%s" as first
argument in the printw call. Patch for that attached, although the
warnings might also be worth a look.
From f3368493fe0365f7f37064fb0ae5fd1fba50fc36 M
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 2021-02-12 17:35 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: autoconf
> Version: 2.69-14
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi!
>
> This package ships identical NEWS and NEWS.Debian file. This means no
> upstream NEWS file is shipped, where all new features are described
> in a concise
Source: devtodo
Version: 0.1.20-8
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara , Sven
Joachim
The purge-tasks and rm-tasks-and-db-file autopkgtests are currently
failing on ci.debian.net, creating a migration problem for ncurses. It
seems however that this has nothing to do with
Package: anacron
Version: 2.3-27
Upgrading from 2.3-26 left the obsolete conffile
/etc/apm/event.d/anacron on the system. Please refer to
dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) and dh_installdeb(1) how to properly clean up
obsolete conffiles.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers
Package: timidity
Version: 2.14.0-5
Severity: serious
In this version, timidity-daemon has become uninstallable:
,
| $ LANG=C aptitude -s install timidity-daemon
| The following packages will be upgraded:
| timidity{b} timidity-daemon
| The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT
Package: timidity
Version: 2.14.0-2
Severity: serious
When upgrading timidity and timidity-daemon from 2.13.2-41 the following
happened (sorry for the German):
,
| Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../timidity_2.14.0-2_i386.deb ...
| Entpacken von timidity (2.14.0-2) über (2.13.2-41+b1) ...
| V
Package: libaudit1
Version: 1:2.3.2-2
The libaudit1 package has a strict dependency on libaudit-common, making
it not coinstallable with a future libaudit2. This effectively defeats
the purpose of libaudit-common.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT po
Package: libsvga1-dev
Version: 1:1.4.3-32
Severity: serious
This version of libsvga1-dev is missing a
"Replaces: libsvga1 (<< 1:1.4.3-32)" for the following change:
,
| svgalib (1:1.4.3-32) unstable; urgency=low
| [ ... ]
| * Move doc/TODO from libsvga1 to libsvga1-dev, and do not install
|
severity 575856 serious
tags 575856 + sid wheezy
thanks
x-dev is now gone for good, nestra does FTBFS in sid because of the
unsatisfiable build dependency.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
On 2010-08-21 04:31 +0200, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> severity 579892 grave
> stop
>
> I can reproduce this bug on Debian Squeeze. This bug makes the
> qtparted package unusable by most or all users. Hence bumping up the
> severity.
>
> The 0.4.5-4+b1 version in Lenny works fine. I wonder what c
On 2010-03-15 10:14 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:36:28AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I'm ready to upgrade master to the current patchlevel (did that here
>> yesterday and installed the resulting packages locally) but I wanted to
>> ask
On 2010-03-14 23:05 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:15:55PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Thanks for providing the manpage(s) now, but there is a little problem.
>> At least in out-of-tree builds (like in the Debian package),
>> ncurses*-config.1 does n
On 2010-03-12 00:07 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 03:37:51PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> >Thanks for providing the manpage(s) now, but there is a little problem.
>> >At least in out-of-tree builds
On 2010-03-02 22:47 +0100, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2010-02-23 05:37 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>> Done, after using the new version for a day
On 2010-02-23 05:37 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Done, after using the new version for a day without noticing any
>> problems and building a few packages with it.
> I got two lintian warnings about the *-config p
On 2010-02-22 03:50 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:35:05AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> In the light of that and given that additional symbols have been
>> introduced since then, I would like to switch to the current upstream
>> patchlevel now,
tags 570915 + moreinfo
thanks
On 2010-02-22 09:29 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> reassign 570915 ncurses
Please CC @packages.debian.org when you reassign a bug, all
I received was the message from the control bot, and I had to look up
the report on the Web.
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 08:36 +0100,
On 2010-02-18 16:59 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-02-18 11:27 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
>
>> I'd like #556378 fixed beforehand, if possible. This is the -static
>> problem, which Sven tried to fix with the --without-dlsym and had
>> build troubles. If I can g
On 2010-02-18 11:27 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello Sven, Thomas and anyone tracking ncurses,
> Apologies if you get double posts, I'm not sure if you are subscribed
> to the packages email alias or not.
I am, but I much rather receive a message twice than never.
> I think we're pretty close
On 2010-02-14 13:50 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> It is not quite that bad as doubling the number of builds since some of
> them are already done with --without-gpm. Here is a patch that adds two
> new build targets and installs the resulting *.a files directly into
> libncur
On 2010-01-10 13:16 +0100, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm part of the group taking over the maintenance of ncurses packages
> within Debian. I noticed your comments at
> http://bugs.debian.org/556378 about the static libraries and configure
> flags.
>
> Currently we build the libraries usin
Am 10.02.2010 um 22:32 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
> Package: ncurses-base
> Version: 5.7+20090803-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> ctrl-c does no longer cause SIGINT.
>
> Debugging this issue:
>
> When I create a new xterm (or rxvt) as a fork from my windowmanager
tags 563272 + patch
thanks
On 2010-01-01 18:23 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: lib64ncurses5-dev
> Version: 5.7+20090803-2
> Severity: serious
>
> at least on sparc, the symlink in /usr/lib64 must point to /lib64.
Indeed, and not only on sparc. This is due to a typo in debian/rules,
her
On 2009-11-02 18:36 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Sven Joachim (svenj...@gmx.de):
>
>> > So, the solution is probably adding it to Depends (or Pre-Depends? I
>> > need to check the policy about this).
>>
>> No, makedev serves absolutely no
On 2009-11-02 07:28 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Michael Prokop (m...@debian.org):
>> Package: capiutils
>> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>>
>> Fresh installation:
>>
>> [...]
>> Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4)
On 2009-10-29 19:15 +0100, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Package: libncurses5-dbg
> Version: 5.7+20090803-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
> User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
>
> All shared libraries
On 2009-08-30 23:02 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The ldconfig part of the story is now dealt with in #249122, and I have
> marked that bug as forwarded instead of #224450. #224450 could be
> solved by either adding the /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 -> libtermcap.so
> symlink
On 2009-08-29 14:01 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> It definitely is a bug in the packaging, but I'm not sure how to best
> resolve it. My favorite solution would be to build the regular
> libraries without -DNDEBUG and use detached debugging symbols instead of
> extra libr
found 532022 5.7+20090607-1
retitle 532022 libncursesw5-dbg: does not ship detached debugging symbols
severity 532022 normal
thanks
On 2009-06-05 21:32 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Package: libncursesw5-dbg
> Version: 5.7+20090523-1
> Severity: grave
I disagree with the severity, as explaine
It seems to me that the relocation of the debug libraries in the "fix"
for bug #532022 was wrong, because these files do not contain detached
debugging symbols but rather different versions of the ncurses
libraries, compiled with trace information and unstripped.
The result is that we now have Lin
On 2009-04-03 20:20 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: ncurses-term
> Version: 5.7+20090321-1
> Severity: normal
>
> $ ls -l /usr/share/terminfo/k/kon2
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Mar 30 21:41 /usr/share/terminfo/k/kon2 -> kon
>
> $ ls -l /usr/share/terminfo/k/kon
> /bin/ls: cannot access /usr/sha
On 2009-09-01 11:07 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2009-08-31 22:27 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
>>> The only other issue is for smm/rmm, which is a nuisance for bash users.
>>> While it's correct, bash users
On 2009-08-31 22:30 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2009-08-29 21:26 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>
>>> A later bug report #135024 is mentioned in the Debian changelog.
>>> It points out a build-dependencies p
On 2009-08-31 22:27 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2009-08-29 22:06 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>
>>> This is still not addressed. For reference, a diff is attached.
>>
>> According to the Debian changelo
Hi,
I'm going through the list of open bugs in ncurses.
On 2007-10-13 06:20 +0200, John E. Davis wrote:
> Package: ncurses-base
> Version: 5.5-5
>
> The rxvt-unicode terminfo file indicates that the escape sequence is
> "ESC 2 $". This can be seen using `infocmp`:
>
> # Reconstructed via
On 2009-08-29 22:06 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> This is still not addressed. For reference, a diff is attached.
According to the Debian changelog, the xterm terminfo database is based
on xterm 200 which is 4.5 years old. Do you think it would be safe to
update to the one in xterm 246?
I agre
On 2009-08-29 21:26 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> A later bug report #135024 is mentioned in the Debian changelog.
> It points out a build-dependencies problem.
Currently there is the problem that gnatmake is not available on armel:
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sid§ion=all&arch=any&se
tags 509919 + patch
thanks
On 2009-08-30 20:01 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> It seems this is not necessary after all. :-) We can configure the
> Debian package with "--with-default-terminfo-dir=/usr/share/terminfo"
> instead. Since we're also configuring with
>
&
tags 224450 - upstream
notforwarded 224450
severity 224450 normal
thanks
The ldconfig part of the story is now dealt with in #249122, and I have
marked that bug as forwarded instead of #224450. #224450 could be
solved by either adding the /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 -> libtermcap.so
symlink or remov
On 2009-08-30 16:24 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2008-12-27 19:15 +0100, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>
>>> Package: ncurses-base
>>> Version: 5.7+20081213-1
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Revi
On 2009-08-30 16:24 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2008-12-27 19:15 +0100, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>
>>> Package: ncurses-base
>>> Version: 5.7+20081213-1
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Revi
On 2008-12-27 19:15 +0100, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Package: ncurses-base
> Version: 5.7+20081213-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Reviewing Ubuntu #200773, which reports this problem,
> I checked my Debian/testing and see that infocmp vt220 shows
>
> if=/etc/tabset/vt100,
>
> That directory does not
severity 528201 normal
reassign 365120 ncurses
merge 365120 528201
thanks
On 2009-05-11 13:11 +0200, Bradley Smith wrote:
> Package: ncurses
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed with:
>
> debian/tmp/usr/bin/tic: symbol lookup error: debian/tmp
severity 480437 normal
retitle 480437 ncurses5-config should be in libncurses5-dev
thanks
On 2008-05-10 02:40 +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> Package: ncurses-bin / libncurses5-dev
> Version: 5.6+20080308-1
> Severity: important
>
> ncurses-bin ships the ncurses5-config binary.
>
> Running ncurse
On 2009-08-27 13:57 +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> acct 6.4~pre1-8 started to ship
> /usr/share/info/dir.gz
> which is very likely not intentional.
>
> Since this is the second bug of this kind i'm writing within quite a
> short time: Maybe you find some hints why packages start shi
On 2009-07-25 17:58 +0200, Ron wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> Thanks for your interest in this!
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:37:25AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I am going to adopt the dict-devil package.
I just uploaded dict-devil 1.0-11 to mentors.debian.net. Would you
Hi Ron,
I am going to adopt the dict-devil package.
On 2005-06-17 14:19 +0200, Ron wrote:
> Package: dict-devil
> Version: 1.0-8
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> The Debian package entry for "lord" reads:
>
> ... "Sir," as, Sir 'Arry Donkiboi, or 'Amstead 'Eath.
>
> I currently have a hard copy of
On 2008-09-13 23:03 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I can do an upload tomorrow, seeing that I did the last upload.
> (I suspect it was broken before that, though)
The previous maintainer apparently had built the package with
debian/devil2dict being executable, so the bug did only show up after
ean:
diff -u dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog
--- dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog
+++ dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dict-devil (1.0-10) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * QA Upload.
+ * Make debian/devil2dict executable to get some content into
+
Giovanni Mascellani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, but I'm not experienced in Perl and I'm not a DD. I still don't
> understand what is the problem.
>
> From your email I understand that gnump3d is supposed to fail because
> some Perl modules were moved from perl-modules to perl-base, and
>
Hi,
there is now another instance of bug #377385: Some modules have been
moved to perl-base, but perl-modules does not depend on that newer
version. This causes "interesting" problems like #442866 and #442869,
so please fix the dependencies.
BTW, the "Replaces" perl-base has on perl-modules need
package ilisp
severity 323540 serious
forcemerge 323540 409520 441153
thanks
This bug prevents Debian's default Emacs version from being configured
if ilisp is installed, see #441153. Therefore I bump the severity and
request that either the patch in the bug logs gets applied or the
package is re
clone 425457 -1
reassign -1 libc6
severity -1 important
retitle -1 libc6 2.6 breaks Emacs
found -1 2.6~20070518-2
tags -1 experimental upstream
thanks
Patrik Hagglund writes:
> Package: emacs-snapshot
> Version: 1:20070302-1
FYI, there are newer snapshots available at http://emacs.orebokech.com.
You probably have to fix the emacs-snapshot alternative
(and possibly other alternatives) manually, please try
update-alternatives --all
(just keep pressing enter), as suggested by Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh in bug #422979. After that you can retry to install
or configure emacs-snapshot.
Regar
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> Package: emacs-snapshot
> Version: 1:20070302-1
Just FYI, emacs-snapshot is now maintained outside of Debian, please
look at http://emacs.orebokech.com/ for newer versions ([1], [2]).
> When tar-mode-show-date is set to t (to get the timestamps), the Tar
> mode displays
[David, please CC the bug submitter if you want him to answer.
He doesn't automatically receive mails sent to the bug number.]
David Smith writes:
> Hello, I'm working on new packages of emacs-snapshot.
>
> I am not able to reproduce this bug. I installed ingerman and tested the
> spelling of t
reassign 417531 elisp-manual
thanks
Kevin Ryde writes:
> Running up
>
> emacs-snapshot -Q
>
> and opening the manual
>
> C-h i g (emacs)
>
> then following the emacs lisp manual link
>
> Tab Ret
>
> opens the emacs 21 manual from the elisp-manual package,
> ie. /usr/share/
Martin Jambor writes:
> Package: emacs-snapshot
> Version: 1:20070302-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Pressing enter right after the incremental-search has started
> (i.e. pressing C-s RET) is supposed to start non-incremental search
> equivalent to launching interactive function search
dann frazier writes:
> Package: emacs-snapshot-gtk
> Version: 1:20070302-1
> Severity: normal
>
> To reproduce:
> 1) start emacs
> 2) use meta+x to enter command buffer
> 3) hit tab
> [SEGV]
>
> I can reproduce w/ both the -q and -Q parameters (as suggested by reportbug).
I cannot reproduce this
Christian Lynbech writes:
> Package: emacs-snapshot-el
> Version: 1:20070302-1
> Severity: normal
>
> In the latest upgrade, a change to the ps-print package has broken it
> badly.
>
> The changelog says:
>
> 2007-03-01 Vinicius Jose Latorre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * ps-print.e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: emacs-snapshot-nox
> Version: 1:20070302-1
> Severity: normal
>
> When I run pr-ps-buffer-print on 1:20070302, printing fails.
> However, on1:20070223, printing worked fine.
>
> On *Message* buffer, ps-print stopped with following error:
>
> ps-generate: Sym
69 matches
Mail list logo
