Source: sysfsutils
Version: 2.1.0+repack-4+b2
Severity: important
I've had the following lines in my /etc/sysfs.conf for years:
bus/pci/drivers/radeon/:02:00.0/power_method = profile
bus/pci/drivers/radeon/:02:00.0/power_profile = low
Retrospectively, I think that's because at the tim
Package: mozplugger
Version: 1.14.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
AFAIK, mozplugger is a NPAPI plugin and chromium has dropped support for
NPAPI plugins some time ago. I don't expect mozplugger to be loaded by
chromium anymore.
Mike
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 08:41:41PM +0100, E Taylor wrote:
> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 6.0.2-1
>
> I run testing/wheezy and upgraded to iceweasel 6.0.2 this weekend,
> closing my running copy of iceweasel first. When I tried to load it
> again, it got as far as loading all the windows and show
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 06:23:18PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:57:51AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > [Kurt, please CC me on your replies. The BTS' -subscribe functionality
> > doesn't
> > seem to be working]
> > [CC'ing ubuntu sec, in case Kees or Jamie or whoever
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:03:27PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/04/2011 09:20 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > NSS now ships modified certs of DigiNotar, their name is "Explicitly
> > Disabled
> > DigiNotar "
> > In chromium, for example, if you browse a DigiNotar-signed websit
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:55:50PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:15:31PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 September 2011 05:55:27 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > Their is also openssl-blacklist, bu
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Looking at the patches, this really is:
> [...]
>
> Ok, with the patches we got NSS covered, but we still need to do something
> for
> other
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Saturday 03 September 2011 01:45:22 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Looking at the patches, this really is:
> [...]
>
> Ok, with the patches we got NSS covered, but we still need to do something
> for
> other
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 08:45:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 07:40:23AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > On W
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 07:40:23AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 07:40:23AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > So, I'll put that on tiredness. That'd be several fraudulent
> > &
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:37:41PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 17:47:57 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:06:39PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Unless other certificates were signed with another CA, at least the
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:06:39PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 01:37:01 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Well, reality is that the Firefox 6.0.1 release, which has a white least
&g
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:37:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02:53PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 23:30:19 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > So, I'll put that on tiredness. That'd be several fraudulent
> > &
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:49:04PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 15:48:11 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > > W
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:08:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:08:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On lun., 2011-08-29 at 20:24 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > I understand that they'd have to ma
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:45:11PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:00AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604.
> > # For the other packages, only a "binNMU" is necessary.
> > # (except that re
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:13:12PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:58:27AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > >
> > > > # For the
# For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604.
# For the other packages, only a "binNMU" is necessary.
# (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all packages)
clone 560106 -1
reassign -1 igerman98
retitle -1 Please rebuild igerman98 against latest dictionaries-common-dev
clone 560
Package: capplets
Version: 1:2.6.1-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/gnome-font-viewer
Tags: experimental
The string shown by the gnome font viewer should be changeable by user
request, for that one may want to look at a japanese, korean, whatever font,
and with the standard english sentence, yo
24 matches
Mail list logo
