v meeting and see what we
can do about this.
Personally, I think the dependency on libnih-dbus-dev looks so minimal
in lomiri-download-manager, it should be replacable.
Mike
--
mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4351) 486 14 27
GnuPG Fi
ave just filed a new bug against screenke and I have also added it
as a blocker to this tracking bug).
Mike
--
mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4351) 486 14 27
GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: sun
Hi Simon,
On Do 10 Dez 2020 16:08:00 CET, Simon McVittie wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:37:21 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
On Do 10 Dez 2020 15:35:19 CET, Paul Gevers wrote:
> We're running into the freeze of bullseye soon. The first bug I checked
&g
Hi Paul,
On Do 10 Dez 2020 15:35:19 CET, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:06:59 + Mike Gabriel
wrote:
>> If you want to get this done for bullseye, please upgrade these bugs to
>> serious. Autoremovals will take care of some of the packages.
The rest w
ous. Autoremovals will take care of some of the packages. The rest will
need manual fixes.
I haven't done that. I think the severity of these bugs is a decision
for the maintainer of the replacement to make.
I think we should start with important and raise to serious after 8
weeks or so
Control: close -1
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 14:22:52 +0100 =?utf-8?Q?Manu_Al=C3=A9n?=
wrote:
> Source: autofs
> Hi,
>
> I have worked with autofs and although I’m going to take care of some
packages more, I think that I could have a bit time to support it.
>
> Please do not hesitate to give m
Control: close -1
Control: fixed -1 5.1.5-1
Hi Salvatore,
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:25:22 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Source: autofs
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi
>
> There was a new autofs version released (5.1.5) upstream, could it be
> packaged for Debian?
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Philippe,
On Wed, 22 May 2013 21:22:06 +0200 Philippe Latu
wrote:
> Package: autofs
> Version: 5.0.7-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
> * What led up to the situation?
> While sett
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: close -1
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:16:54 -0400 "John E. Davis"
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:55:38 +0200, Reinhard Tartler
said:
> >from your logs, I notice that you are running an i386 userland with
> >amd64 kernel. Can you confirm the segfaults also wi
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, 07 May 2017 10:22:06 +0500 Anton Karmanov
wrote:
> Package: autofs
> Version: 5.0.8-2+deb8u1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I'am trying to get autofs package whith apt on an arm64 machine.
> During installation I get the messages:
>
> Settin
Hi,
On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:18:08 +0200 Vincent Danjean
wrote:
> Package: autofs
> Version: 5.1.2-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> Since stretch update, there is no way to automount a smb share with a
'$' at
> the end of its name anymore. But these names are automaticcaly
generated by
> w
Control: close -1
Hi Cedric,
On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:07:58 +0200
=?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Dufour_-_Idiap_Research_Institute?=
wrote:
> It seems this problem is adressed more globally as per bug #897599:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897599
>
> Which led to fix for CVE-2018-1
Control: fixed -1 5.1.0-1
Control: tags -1 jessie
HI,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:05:17 -0400 Colten Levi
wrote:
> Package: autofs
> Version: 5.0.8-2+deb8u1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
> I was able to patch au
unt nfs4 mounts it works
However, I suspect that we cannot entangle autofs and NFS as much as you
propose here. Note that people also may use autofs for local device
mounting and don't run NFS with it at all.
So, for the autofs side of things, I propose this (a Wants= solution
rather than a R
Hi Ivo,
On Mi 17 Okt 2018 15:46:11 CEST, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Control: block 895038 by 895037
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:07:39PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Package: src:libappindicator
Severity: serious
The libappindicator package is currently QA team maintained in Debian and
shall be
ator to be removed from Debian, the
src:libappindicator must become to a removable state, see [1].
Thanks,
Mike
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895037
--
mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139
GnuPG Fingerprint:
ng and the porting
status, see [2]
Greets,
Mike
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/03/msg00506.html
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/Ayatana/IndicatorsTransition
--
mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer)
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139
GnuPG Fingerprint:
muxi (= 1.0.7-2)
smuxi
So, in a nutshell, these packages need to be addressed: smuxi,
pidgin-libnotify and mopidy-mpris require changes to have libindicate
removed from Debian.
Greets,
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4
18 matches
Mail list logo
