tags 729813 + patch
tags 729813 + upstream
thanks
hi again,
it seems opensuse ships a way more recent version of the module, fixing this
bug aswell as some others. Apparently this one has been around for quit a
while...
2011-05-11 Thorsten Kukuk
* release version 2.8
* configure.
hi there,
i think this happens because of:
checking for xcrypt_gensalt_r... no
checking the source reads:
#if defined(HAVE_XCRYPT_GENSALT_R)
[ do stuff ]
#else
__write_message (pamh, flags, PAM_ERROR_MSG,
_("No support for blowfish included"));
I guess md5 is broken a
Package: cgilib, libcgi-dev
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation
hi,
both cgilib and libcgi-dev ship `/usr/lib/libcgi.a' but do neither
conflict nor add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the
same environment:
> Unpacking libcgi-dev (from .../libcgi-dev_1.0-6_amd64.deb) ...
Package: pexts
Version: 0.2.0-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/pexts-0.2.0/src'
> Making AdminToo
Package: linux-igd
Version: 0.cvs20060201-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> iptc.c:9:41: error: linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h: No such file
hi,
just for the record: tidev-modules have been removed from unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tidev-modules/news/20070612T081240Z.html
see also:
http://bugs.debian.org/362162
it seems like those kernel modules are now part of the mainstream kernel, so
are probably still working.
b
Package: libooc-xml-dev
Version: 3.2.0-2
Severity: serious
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install with
the following error:
Setting up libooc-xml-dev (3.2.0-2) ...
xargs: /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing libooc-
Package: flyspray
Version: 0.9.8-12
Severity: serious
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of ucf beeing unavailable during postrm:
Remov
found 417026 1.0.13a-9
thanks
hi,
while re-running pipuarts on the packages which have marked their
bugs as fixed, your package failed again to remove because of having
non-essential depends in its postrm file:
> Removing remstats ...
> Purging configuration files for remstats ...
> /var/lib/
severity 428977 normal
reassign 428977 ftp.debian.org
retitle 428977 RoM: cipe-source, cipe-common, pkcipe -- RoM; Orphaned, dead
upstream, does not work with any debian kernel, low popcon, obsoleted by openvpn
thanks
hi
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:17:00PM +0200, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> The cip
Package: kwave
Version: 0.7.7-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> plugin "codec_flac": extracting code with MOC for VorbisCommentMap.h
> plugin "codec
Package: flac123
Version: 0.0.9-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> debian/rules build
> dh_testdir
> # Configuring package
> CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2"
found 417026 1.0.13a-8
thanks
hi,
while re-running pipuarts on the packages which have marked their
bugs as fixed, your package failed again to remove because of having
non-essential depends in its postrm file:
Removing remstats ...
Purging configuration files for remstats ...
/var/lib/dpk
Package: tex-guy
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> gcc -I. -Wall -o dvispecials dvispecials.o
> -L/build/user/tex-guy-1.3.2/DVIlib2
Package: turkey
Version: 1.34.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> [javac] ^-^
> [javac] *** Semantic Error: The class file "Fo
hi,
some more information about this issue has been posted to the debian-python
list, see following link for how to fix this issue:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2007/05/msg00017.html
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Package: kiwi
Severity: serious
Version: 1.9.13-3
Justification: policy violation
hi,
Lucas has rebuild the archive on i386 and your package Failed to Build
from Source with the following error:
> mv
> debian/python-kiwi/usr/share/python-support/python-kiwi/kiwi-1.9.13-py*.egg-info
> \
>
Package: vstream
Version: 0.4.5-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Orphaned
* Probably outdated (last
Package: open21xx
Version: 0.7.5-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Orphaned
* RC Buggy since Years
Package: libooc-x11
Version: 20020123-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Orphaned
* RC Buggy
*
Package: libooc-xml
Version: 3.2.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Orphaned
* RC Buggy
* li
Package: libnewt-perl
Version: 1.08-10+b1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Long standing Orphaned Package
Package: libbusiness-ups-perl
Version: 1.13-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Outdated
* Orphaned
Package: libnet-ftpserver-perl
Version: 1.122-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Outdated
* Orphaned
Package: libapache2-mod-ifier
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Release Critical Bugs
*
Package: ivi
Version: 0.4.pre.20031121-4+b1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Several Release Critical Bugs
Package: drip
Severity: serious
Version: 0.9.0-4
Justification: policy violation
hi,
Lucas has rebuild the archive on i386 and your package Failed to Build
from Source with the following error:
In file included from external.cpp:46:
/usr/include/avifile-0.7/creators.h:4:2: warning: #warning U
Package: nbio
Version: 2.0-14
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation
hi,
your package fails to build from source:
Completed creating jarfile...
seda.nbio.NBIOFileDescriptor...
debian/make-libnbio.sh: line 78: /usr/bin/gcjh: No such file or directory
Error: unable to build all
Package: noffle
Version: 1.2.0~rc1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: etch-ignore
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of ucf beeing unavailable during postrm:
Removing noffle ...
Purging configuration file
Package: ethiop
Version: 0.7-10, 0.7-11
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy violation
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of tetex-bin beeing unavailable during postrm:
dpkg: error processing ethiop (--purge):
subprocess post-removal scrip
hi,
seconded. I dont think it makes sense to keep this package in the
archive anymore.
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: afnix, aleph
Severity: serious
Justification: file conflicts between packages, policy violation
hi,
both afnix and aleph do ship several files of eachother but do not
conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same
environment:
Unpacking aleph (from .../aleph_0.9.0-3
tags 405517 + fixed
thanks
hi,
package description has been fixed as with the upload of 2.2-2. As it
seems libmxml1 is out-of-date on mips, but has been built successfully.
Maybe buildd admins missed to upload it? CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=mxml&ver=2.2-2&
tags 405396 + fixed
thanks
hi,
package description has been fixed as with the upload of 2.2-2. As it
seems libmxml1 is out-of-date on mips, but has been built successfully.
Maybe buildd admins missed to upload it? CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=mxml&ver=2.2-2&
tags 404720 + confirmed
severity 404720 serious
thanks
hi,
i can reproduce this segfault on amd64/cowbuilder chroot:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# /usr/games/trr_format
Segmentation fault
im not sure if this renders the package unusable, i think so. Setting
the severity to RC to be sure.
bye,
- m
Package: libmotif-dev
Version: 2.2.3-1.5
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev ship
`/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz' but do not conflict or add a
diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg: error proc
hi,
after some investigation it seems like interchange ships Business::UPS:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/qa$ dpkg -c interchange_5.4.1-1_amd64.deb | grep Business
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07
./usr/lib/interchange/auto/Business/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07
./us
Package: libbusiness-ups-perl
Version: 1.13-4
Severity: serious
Justfication: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl ship
`/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz' but do not conflict or add a
diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
tags 394370 + patch
thanks
hi,
attached patch fixes this issue.
bye,
- michael
diff -ruN orig/gnump3d-2.9.9.9/bin/gnump3d2 gnump3d-2.9.9.9/bin/gnump3d2
--- orig/gnump3d-2.9.9.9/bin/gnump3d2 2006-11-09 13:08:32.0 +0100
+++ gnump3d-2.9.9.9/bin/gnump3d22006-11-09 13:09:24.000
hi,
i think the following patch from CVS fixes this issue:
http://clozure.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ccl/lisp-kernel/lisp-debug.c.diff?r2=1.5&r1=1.4&diff_format=u
you can also find it as attachment.
bye,
- michael
===
RCS file:
hi,
the object files are listed in libtool (predep_objects). After removing
this line the build goes well. Also, after an autoconf/automake update
this issue is gone but the package fails to build the following way:
[..]
ar: transportaddressblock.o~ranlib: No such file or directory
[..]
bye,
TED]>
Subject: Re: [Mjpeg-developer] jpeg-xmms build issues with gcc 4.1
Reply-To: Developer mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> jpeg-mmx fails to build from source using gcc 4.1:
That's not surprising - seems each new versio
forwarded 379497 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
hi,
jpeg-xmms fails to build from source using gcc 4.1:
> gcc -O2 -I. -c -o fdctdata.o fdctdata.c
> gcc -O2 -I. -c -o jquant_x86simd.o jquant_x86simd.c
> /tmp/ccT4Nyhx.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccT4Nyhx.s:59: Error: suffix or operands inval
tags 379497 + help
thanks
hi,
see attached patch, *& can be omitted, though. Another posibility is to
use:
__asm__ ( "ldmxcsr (%0)\n" : : "X" (trunc_mxcsr) );
i lack the needed SSE/ASM/Intel know-how, tagging with help, asking
upstream for what would be the best solution. Both gentoo and other
tags 379497 + patch
thanks
hi,
attached patch fixes this issue. Im not entirely sure if it breaks
something, see this bugreport:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26653
as by now upstream has not fixed this either in CVS or newer releases.
bye,
- michael
--- libjpeg-mmx-0.1.5.or
reopen 374624
thanks
hi again,
shot too fast, should have tested compiling it on i386 too, the patch
breaks it on i386.
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
forwarded 369726 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
hi Steve,
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:47:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> (gdb) up
> #1 0x0048726b in Enter (w=0x6bc210, event=0x7fa82be0)
> at MenuBtn.c:1479
> 1479 mbutton->menubutton.hintProc(mbutton->menubutton.hint);
> (gd
package: xcircuit
severity: grave
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:47:24 -0700
To: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tim Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xcircuit 3.6.24-1 unusable on amd64
Hi -
I don't mean to c
hi Tim,
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:16:37AM -0700, R. Timothy Edwards wrote:
> I wasn't aware that the Debian package uses Xw. I thought
> that the executable was compiled with Tcl/Tk, and assumes
> Tcl/Tk as a dependency for the package.
well, the original maintainer (which orphaned the package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi Rudy,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 06:28:05PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > I've updated xfce4-diskperf-plugin to the latest upstream version,
> > changelog looks like this:
> >
> > xfce4-diskperf-plugin (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* QA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi Rudy, *,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:52:15PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > Rudy did you actually want to adopt these packages?[0] They need a bit of
> > whipping into shape so they can ship with sarge and someone really needs
> > to do this. It's j
tags 216948 + confirmed
tags 216948 + upstream
thanks
hi,
upstream is aware of this problem, at the moment there is no
easy way to fix this. See those posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://raggle.org/pipermail/raggle-dev/2003-October/000167.html
http://raggle.org/pipermail/raggle-dev/2003-Augus
tags 216947 + unreproducable
tags 216947 + moreinfo
thanks
hi,
Can't reproduce this behavior. Here, raggle correctly opens and
quits links/w3m/whatever when used with screen and the above
mentioned rss feed..
Can you please check if this Bug still appears using the recent
raggle versions from
53 matches
Mail list logo
