Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> There was a texlive update in the meantime. Here are the versions of
> packages that differ.
I explored this a bit today -- there's something quite amiss with the
docbook toolchain. I'm seeing a lot of this error:
! Undefined control sequence.
\close@pdf
Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
>> reassign 739743 src:fontconfig 2.11.0-4
> Bug #739743 [libfontconfig1] FTBFS: circular dependency
> Bug reassigned from package 'libfontconfig1' to 'src:fontconfig'.
> Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #739743 to the same values
> previously se
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:44:18 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> In the meanwhile, defoma was uploaded with the debhelper-like syntax
> (as quoted above). In my previous mail[1], you can scratch “until new
> defoma is installed on all architectures” since it's arch: all. ;)
Ok, I've adopted the same
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:03:59 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Keith Packard (30/12/2009):
> > > I'm about to QA-upload defoma with this change in the various
> > > debhelper-files/* files, but I wanted to open this bugreport for
> > > reference.
>
> F
o open this bugreport for
> reference.
>
> Cc'ing defoma folks and buildd folks, since they might be interested in
> knowing about this.
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
Here's a patch which I've used to build new fontconfig packages which
should survive the absence of defoma.
5 matches
Mail list logo
