Bug#215001: dict-freedict: Addendum

Package: dict-freedict Version: 1.1-4 Followup-For: Bug #215001 A further note: In having to re-install all the depending dictionaries (which, BTW, all have dict-freedict's changelog -- not their own), I note that (at least using 'apt-get -f install' after I'd used 'dpkg -i --force-depends', in

Bug#215014: dict-freedict: No changelogs for the whackload of dictionaries dumped-into testing

Package: dict-freedict Version: 1.1-4 Severity: normal Not one of the huge number of the dict-freedict dictionaries which fell into testing today had a changelog, etc. with it. Only dict-freedict itself did (if I recall correctly). For a number of reasons, IMO, this is not good. Seems to me a s

Bug#215007: Depends on packages which instead should depend on dict-freedict?

Package: dict-freedict Version: 1.1-4 (not installed) Severity: important dict-freedict *depends on* a slew of dictionary packages. Shouldn't it be the other way `round? IMO the usual situation should be that dict-freedict should be installable as a stand-alone package, if needs-be. As matters s

Bug#215001: dict-freedict: All dictionaries reload dictd server twice when upgrading

Package: dict-freedict Version: 1.1-4 Severity: normal Perhaps I don't understand the purpose of the exercise, but it seems to me that it is absolutely UNnecessary to restart dictd, BOTH after unpacking the newer version of a dictionary, AND setting that package up. The duplicate script coding? a