On 2012-05-15 18:19, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 15:20:50 -0400
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
[...]
adept is a package manager, displaying wrong descriptions makes it unfit
for release.
Not true - it is a bug but as long as adept can install packages from
the package names and get
On 2012-05-15 14:45, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 14:34:44 -0400
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
severity 673040 serious
Don't do severity ping-pong. adept is orphaned, so I lowered the
severity as part of the QA team. You, as submitter, must provide
justification for the severity
severity 673040 serious
thanks
Hi Neil,
On 2012-05-15 13:31, Neil Williams wrote:
severity 673040 normal
done
On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:44:37 -0400
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Package: adept
Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2
Severity: serious
No justification for this severity. Downgrading.
adept is
Package: adept
Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2
Severity: serious
adept was apparently not adapted to work with the new Packages files
that do not have extended descriptions. Consequently, it shows short
descriptions instead of extended descriptions, as if APT had been
configured to download no descri
Package: libenchant1c2a
Version: 1.6.0-4
Severity: minor
The short description ends with:
This package contains shared library.
The singular noun phrase "shared library" is missing a determiner. There
is no reason to use the zero article here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packa
Package: enchant
Version: 1.6.0-4
Severity: normal
enchant's manpage contains:
SYNOPSIS
enchant [-a] [-l] [-L] [-v]
However, calling enchant without arguments outputs:
Usage: enchant [options] -a|-d dict|-l|-L|-m|-v[v]|
-a lists alternatives.
-d dict uses dictionary .
Package: enchant
Version: 1.6.0-4
Severity: minor
The NAME section of enchant-lsmod's manpage contains:
enchant-lsmod - Show information about avalable spell-checking modules
and dictionaries.
"avalable" is missing a "i" ("available").
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...
Package: mybashburn
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: minor
The descriptions could use more attention. The extended description
contains:
MyBashBurn is the version/fork owned for the cd burning shell script
called
BashBurn for Linux, this originally not have the best eye-candy
CD-burning,
neverthel
This appears when upgrading from 0.6.3-1 to 0.9.1-1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 379563 normal
thanks
Having an associated manual page is a "should" directive, not a "must".
Downgrading to the proper severity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
#334361 caused pppoeconf to make an invalid /etc/network/interfaces in
certain cases. I submitted two patches, one fixing the bug, and one to
take precautions against similar bugs being reintroduced, or even
already existing. The firs
Justin Pryzby a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 01:34:32AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
thanks for fixing this, but did somebody investigate why kernel 2.4
dealt so badly with this segfault, and whether 3.1r2's 2.4 kernels have
this fixed? That issue is largely more worrying
Hi,
thanks for fixing this, but did somebody investigate why kernel 2.4
dealt so badly with this segfault, and whether 3.1r2's 2.4 kernels have
this fixed? That issue is largely more worrying to me than the previous
xdialog's SEGV on 2.6 :/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.8
Followup-For: Bug #334361
First I'll clarify what David Fasani meant. By "erase the old "auto"
variable values", he thinks that auto is a variable and that the added
line #20 changes its value. Actually, #20 just declares new auto
interfaces, but since eth0 is alrea
Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The copyright file mentions only the GPL, but the manpage seems to
contradict this.
Since Eduard wrote this, relicensing shouldn't be too problematic
:)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT pref
Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.8
Followup-For: Bug #315884
I can reproduce this problem. The problem is about answering No to the
first screen of pppoeconf. pppoeconf mentions it will run modconf. The
problem is that pppoeconf expects modconf to be installed despite not
depending on it. The effect
Package: webmin-samba
Version: 1.160-3
Severity: normal
The "Unix UID" in "Edit Samba User" screen is always 1000, which
is my UID, while I'm logged in webmin as root. This is true for bin,
root, lp, etc. I have no idea why.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT
Package: webmin-samba
Version: 1.160-3
Severity: normal
In "Edit Samba users and passwords", at the screen "Edit Samba User",
the checkbox "Account disabled" is checked by default for all users,
giving no way to log in to the Samba server. Unchecking this box then
saving does not enable the accoun
FYI, this is still broken and makes webmin-adsl unusable by default.
Maybe that should be considered more than a "normal bug". It's no wonder
why this is the only bug of this package...
19 matches
Mail list logo
