Hi,
You mentioned you were planning to adopt lgeneral after squeeze's release
and squeeze has been out for a couple of months now. I was just curious
about the status of this.
Thanks,
Drew Daniels
http://www.boxheap.net/ddaniels/blog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...
> --- /usr/share/doc/megahal/examples/Hal.pm 2000-09-01 13:36:58.0
> -0400
> +++ Hal.pm 2004-01-07 16:04:26.0 -0500
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
> # Save brain.
> sub save {
> $wselect->can_write();
> - syswrite(WRITE,"#save\n\n",8);
> + syswrite(WRITE,"#quie
Hi,
I'm wondering if you'd consider dropping the clause against using bulkmail
for sending unsolicited commercial email. This would allow bulkmail to be
distributed as a part of Debian.
Limiting the uses or users of a program violates the Debian Free Software
Guidelines (DFSG) which can be found a
Hi,
I don't think AI is quite right a category anyway. This program is
actually more of a "conversation simulator". I don't see any category
which MegaHal really seams to fit into.
The submitter of bug 37157 suggested games/toys but I have to agree with
Joey Hess, MegaHal is more than a toy.
Meg
Package: megahal
retitle 178063 megahal: warning on startup
severity 178063 wishlist
thanks
megahal-personal is probably what you were looking for.
When I tried it I got a warning. I'll see if I can figure out how to get a
more descriptive warning message.
Drew Daniels
Package: megahal
Severity: wishlist
Megahal now has a sourceforge project and sourceforge web page at
http://megahal.sourceforge.net/ additionally http://www.megahal.net points
to the sf megahal home page. The've released a newer version of megahal
and it seems that the IRC functionality is very i
Build depending on flex-old may make this problem disappear. flex-old was
depreciated at the time of it's inclusion. Plans should be made to
transition to flex, but if there's a rush flex-old can be used to ease the
transition. Bug #193229 is for documentation about migrating from flex-old
to flex.
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This bug may be worked around (and therefore downgraded) by having a
> > configuration to warn the user that they must trust the DNS servers
> > (wherever this is configu
Sorry for the crosspost, but I wanted to include everyone potentially
interested in this bug.
The home page for dnrd [1] seems to indicate that it is intended for use
for a single computer or an internal network. The typical user will likely
only want to allow input to dnrd from trusted sources [2
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Clark, Dennis wrote:
> When I mailed this the first time I had mistakenly thought the BTS would
> automatically forward the message to you, then I checked the BTS
> documentation and saw that the submitter only gets an automatic email when
> the bug is closed, not for regular
Package: bnetd
Severity: normal
bnetd seems to be succeeded by pvpgn. Perhaps this may address issues
regarding bug #134984.
Drew Daniels
I think DSA-281 [1] addresses this buffer overflow in moxftp, but I
haven't looked to see if it is the same issue.
[1] http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-281
Drew Daniels
12 matches
Mail list logo
