I can confirm that the bug is present in the latest version of
fluidsynth upstream, and I have created a ticket upstream as well. You
can follow this bug report here:
http://fluidsynth.resonance.org/trac/ticket/45
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
A fixed version has been available for a while now, and it is waiting
for a sponsor. The fixed version can be found at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fluidsynth/
If you want to see this bug fixed, please consider testing and/or
sponsoring this upload. Thank you!
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Lucas Nussbaum skrev:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
There is a fixed version available here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fluidsynth/
If you want to help out, please consider testing and/or sponsoring this
upload. Tha
It seems like doc/example.sf2 is ripped from VintageWavesDreams-v2.sf2.
This makes this problem worse since
1) This is not allowed according to VintageWavesDreams-v2.sf2's license
2) doc/example.sf2 is distributed as a part of the binary package
libfluidsynth-dev
Reference: http://lists.gnu.org/
tarball, so no binary packages are affected.
I could use some advice on how to proceed, and possibly some assistance
as well.
Thanks,
David Henningsson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Bart Martens skrev:
> Package: fluidsynth
> Version: 1.0.8-2
> Severity: serious
>
> The file fluidsynth_1.0.8.orig.tar.gz in Debian contains these files:
>
> sf2/VintageDreamsWaves-v2.sf2
> sf2/Makefile.in
> sf2/Makefile.am
> sf2/COPYRIGHT
>
> The license in sf2/COPYRIGHT contains "It is not al
6 matches
Mail list logo
