Bug#652618: cwdaemon: FTBFS, build-depends can no longer be fullfilled

2011-12-19 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
tags 652618 +patch thanks [ adding the unixcw maintainer to the loop ] [ also adding Michael as Cc, as last NMUer of the package he might have interest in it ] Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [111219 11:09]: > I'm sorry, but I fear your package will FTBFS starting with the next &g

Bug#652618: cwdaemon: FTBFS, build-depends can no longer be fullfilled

2011-12-19 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: cwdaemon Version: 0.9.4-7.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi! I'm sorry, but I fear your package will FTBFS starting with the next dinstall run. Background is that unixcw dropped to build the package unixcw-dev on which cwdaemon build-depends. And well... I cruft-removed said

Bug#652618: cwdaemon: FTBFS, build-depends can no longer be fullfilled

2011-12-19 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
tags 652618 +wheezy +sid thanks Only wheezy and sid are affected, squeeze still has the removed package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eef11

Bug#649709: gs-common removed: this bug is now RC.

2011-12-19 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi Miguel! * Miguel de Val-Borro [111203 18:52]: [..] > The attached patch removes the Build-Dependency on gs-common. Thanks for your patch, I uploaded it the other day. Just one minor remark continueing the discussion from the BSP: As this package is orphaned (meaning it doesn't have a real m

Bug#639590: binutils-z80: unbuildable in unstable

2011-12-08 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Bump standards to 3.9.2 (no changes needed) + + -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:45:01 +0100 + binutils-z80 (2.21.52-2) unstable; urgency=low * temp fix build by overriding tc-z80.c from the binutils tarfile diff -Nru binutils-z80-2.21.52/debian/control binutils-z80-2.22/debian/contr

Re: E16 maintainer

2011-07-13 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi Will, Am 12.07.2011 22:49, schrieb Will Hill: > I'm a user of e16 on debian and would like to get in touch with the > maintainer. I'm sorry to inform you, that there currently is no active maintainer of the e16 package (see http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/e16.html). The package version in

Re: Bug#617588: RM: snes9x -- RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, low popcon

2011-03-10 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
tags 617588 +moreinfo thanks Hi! * Moritz Muehlenhoff [110309 21:36]: > Please remove snes9x: [..] Agreed, however: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: snes9express/contrib: snes9express [amd64 i386 mips mipsel powerpc sparc] # Broken Build-Depends: snes9express/contrib: snes9x

Re: Bug#474528: mffm-timecode: requesting removal

2011-02-20 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
tags 474528 + moreinfo thanks Hi! * Lucas Nussbaum [110219 18:39]: > The mffm-timecode package has been orphaned for a long time, and nobody has > been willing to take it over. > I am therefore requesting its removal from Debian. Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: wsola: wsola-

Re: Bug#388360: pydance-music: requesting removal

2011-02-20 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
tags 388360 + moreinfo thanks * Lucas Nussbaum [110220 08:38]: > The pydance-music package has been orphaned for a long time, and nobody has > been willing to take it over. > I am therefore requesting its removal from Debian. # Broken Depends: pydance: pydance Should that be remove,d too? Then

Bug#611273: wmii: needs Depends: dash

2011-01-28 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi Casey! * Casey Zacek [110127 16:57]: > Package: wmii > Version: 3.9.2+debian-2 [..] > Debian Release: 5.0.8 > APT prefers lenny Thanks vor your bug report! However it leaves some questions open: Lenny, the current stable release, was shipped with version 3.6+debian-4, while 3.9.2+debian-

Bug#603450: Is 603450 realy release critical?

2010-12-08 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 08.12.2010 10:37, schrieb Bastian Blank: > #564690 is an old example of the same problem. So is #547092 (which has severity important). And I'm sure if we dig deep enough, we can find others as well. >> There's patch floating arround, which has a major regression: It doesn't >> work fo

Bug#603450: Fwd: Due offlineimap absence of certificate validation issue -- Debian BTS#603450

2010-12-08 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 08.12.2010 09:33, schrieb dave b: >> I verified it, and your patch works: I accepts valid ssl connections, >> and rejects invalid ones. At this point I should have also said "many thanks for your work!" Sorry, didn't had a coffee when I wrote my first mail ;) >>> +self.sslobj =

Bug#603450: Adopting offlineimap

2010-12-08 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi John! * John Ferlito [100719 15:22]: > I've already done some work on cleaning up the package, so it is now > lintian clean. Will begin work on fixing a whole heap of the bugs > next. > > Am aiming to be come the new upstream maintainer. Looking over the list of release critical bugs, I stu

Bug#603450: Is 603450 realy release critical?

2010-12-07 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi release manager, #603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking. While I agree, that this is a really important feature, which should be fixed, I'm wondering, if that really is release critical. There's pa

Bug#603450: Fwd: Due offlineimap absence of certificate validation issue -- Debian BTS#603450

2010-12-07 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi dave! * dave b [101202 05:58]: > Here have a patch! > This obviously will break connecting to hosts which use a self-signed > certificate. > Perhaps some one else can fix this when they want it fixed ;) ? > I tested using the following config: I verified it, and your patch works: I accepts

Bug#588696: Attempted to update that package and failed :(

2010-10-29 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
dards to 3.9.1 (no changes needed) * Don't build as native package -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:05:43 +0200 I basically downloaded the new files from http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/sunbird/releases/1.0b1/linux-i686/xpi/ dropped no longer suppor

Bug#582517: crystalcursors: Update-alternatives errors

2010-05-25 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
severity 582517 serious thanks * John Lindgren [100524 03:26]: > I have exactly the same problem. Shouldn't this bug be severity > "grave", since it makes the package uninstallable? Not necessary grave, but certainly serious as the package is uninstallable. Jari, it seems your prepares the l

Comments regarding ne_2.0.3-1_i386.changes

2009-09-27 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi Maintainer! I going to accept the package, but could you please update debian/copyright with one of your next uploads? Some files (e.g. regex.{h,c}, cm.{c,h}, term.c, termcap.{c,h}, tparm.c) seem to have been taken from emacs, and the copyright holder is the FSF. Other files (syn*) seem to co