kupfer is marked for autoremoval from testing

kupfer 327-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-10-21 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1082576: kupfer: Kupfer fails to run commands https://bugs.debian.org/1082576 For more information on the autoremoval process, including hints to prevent autoremoval can be found on the wiki: htt

Processing of sqlcipher_4.6.1-1_source.changes

sqlcipher_4.6.1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sqlcipher_4.6.1-1.dsc sqlcipher_4.6.1.orig.tar.gz sqlcipher_4.6.1-1.debian.tar.xz sqlcipher_4.6.1-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

sqlcipher_4.6.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:33:04 -0400 Source: sqlcipher Architecture: source Version: 4.6.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boyuan

Bug#1083059: hfsplus: FTBFS with gcc-14

Package: hfsplus Version: 1.0.4-17.1ubuntu1 Severity: normal Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: daniel.bung...@canonical.com User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu oracular Dear Maintainer, This bug report was also filed in Ubuntu and can be found at https://launchpad.net/bugs/2083086

Bug#1082604: Should syncmaildir be removed from unstable?

Hi! On 2024-09-29 18:25:24, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: [...] > I would be tempted to mark it as such, but I'm somehow biased. I still > have one setup which syncmaildir is used. Sorry, maybe I missed some of the above (redacted) context here, but what do you mean "as such", mark for removal yo

Processed: xine-lib-1.2: consider disabling DirectFB support

Processing control commands: > block 1083037 by -1 Bug #1083037 [src:directfb] directfb: Should this package be removed? 1083037 was blocked by: 1083040 1083042 1083043 1083044 1083037 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1083037: 1083045 -- 1083037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Processed: baresip: consider disabling DirectFB support

Processing control commands: > block 1083037 by -1 Bug #1083037 [src:directfb] directfb: Should this package be removed? 1083037 was blocked by: 1083040 1083042 1083043 1083037 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1083037: 1083044 -- 1083037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Processed: directvnc: should this package be removed?

Processing control commands: > block 1083037 by -1 Bug #1083037 [src:directfb] directfb: Should this package be removed? 1083037 was blocked by: 1083040 1083042 1083037 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1083037: 1083043 -- 1083037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Processed: links2: consider disabling DirectFB support

Processing control commands: > block 1083037 by -1 Bug #1083037 [src:directfb] directfb: Should this package be removed? 1083037 was blocked by: 1083040 1083037 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1083037: 1083042 -- 1083037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1083

Processed: gst-plugins-bad1.0: consider disabling DirectFB support

Processing control commands: > block 1083037 by -1 Bug #1083037 [src:directfb] directfb: Should this package be removed? 1083037 was not blocked by any bugs. 1083037 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1083037: 1083040 -- 1083037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#1083037: directfb: Should this package be removed?

Source: directfb Severity: serious Justification: ensure visibility for potential adopters X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: directfb directfb has been unmaintained in Debian since 2018, and its web pages directfb.org a

Processing of ddcci-driver-linux_0.4.4-3_source.changes

ddcci-driver-linux_0.4.4-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ddcci-driver-linux_0.4.4-3.dsc ddcci-driver-linux_0.4.4-3.debian.tar.xz ddcci-driver-linux_0.4.4-3_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.or

Bug#1077212: marked as done (ddcci-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.10: error: I2C_CLASS_SPD undeclared)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:48:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077212: fixed in ddcci-driver-linux 0.4.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077212, regarding ddcci-dkms: module fails to build for Linux 6.10: error: I2C_CLASS_SPD undeclared to be marked as done. This m

ddcci-driver-linux_0.4.4-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:25:45 +0200 Source: ddcci-driver-linux Architecture: source Version: 0.4.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By