Bug#1071544: tla: FTBFS on arm64/ppc64el/riscv64: config.guess: unable to guess system type

Source: tla Version: 1.3.5+dfsg1-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear maintainer, The tla packages fails to build on a few "recent" architectures due to outdated config.guess/sub: | cd debian/build && \ | CFLAGS='-g

nslint_3.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 22:37:27 +0200 Source: nslint Architecture: source Version: 3.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Petter Reinh

Processing of nslint_3.2-1_source.changes

nslint_3.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nslint_3.2-1.dsc nslint_3.2.orig.tar.gz nslint_3.2-1.debian.tar.xz nslint_3.2-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1067439: marked as done (cpu: undefined symbol globalLdap in libcpu_ldap.so on Debian 12)

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 20:37:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067439: fixed in cpu 1.4.3-14~deb11u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067439, regarding cpu: undefined symbol globalLdap in libcpu_ldap.so on Debian 12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

cpu_1.4.3-14~deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 03:34:34 +0200 Source: cpu Architecture: source Version: 1.4.3-14~deb11u1 Distribution: bullseye Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Andr

ghostscript_10.0.0~dfsg-11+deb12u4_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 22:20:16 +0200 Source: ghostscript Architecture: source Version: 10.0.0~dfsg-11+deb12u4 Distribution: bookworm-security Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian QA Gr

Processed: Re: Bug#841179: nslint bug: unknown RR types SSHFP and LOC

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #841179 [nslint] nslint bug: unknown RR types SSHFP and LOC Added tag(s) patch. -- 841179: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841179 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#841179: nslint bug: unknown RR types SSHFP and LOC

Control: tags -1 + patch Here is a untested draft patch to get nslint to ignore LOC and SSHFP entries. --- nslint-salsa.orig/nslint.c 2024-05-20 22:22:30.853916890 +0200 +++ nslint-salsa/nslint.c 2024-05-20 22:23:11.482321491 +0200 @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ #define REC_RP 0x0200 #def

Processed: Re: Bug#763500: nslint: Accept _ in TXT entries?

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #763500 [nslint] nslint: Accept _ in TXT entries? Added tag(s) patch. -- 763500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763500 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#763500: nslint: Accept _ in TXT entries?

Control: tags -1 + patch I suspect a patch similar to this might solve it, by allowing _ at the start for both TXT and SRV records. diff --git a/nslint.c b/nslint.c index f298ad1..ef1c9d1 100644 --- a/nslint.c +++ b/nslint.c @@ -2762,6 +2762,11 @@ rfc1034host(const char *host, int recs)

Processing of aspic_2.00+dfsg-3_source.changes

aspic_2.00+dfsg-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: aspic_2.00+dfsg-3.dsc aspic_2.00+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz aspic_2.00+dfsg-3_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1043971: marked as done (aspic: Fails to build source after successful build)

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 09:49:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1043971: fixed in aspic 2.00+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1043971, regarding aspic: Fails to build source after successful build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1049554: marked as done (aspic: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build)

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 09:49:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1049554: fixed in aspic 2.00+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1049554, regarding aspic: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

aspic_2.00+dfsg-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 11:29:35 +0200 Source: aspic Architecture: source Version: 2.00+dfsg-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Petter

Processing of mmake_2.3-10_source.changes

mmake_2.3-10_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mmake_2.3-10.dsc mmake_2.3-10.debian.tar.xz mmake_2.3-10_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

mmake_2.3-10_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 10:53:06 +0200 Source: mmake Architecture: source Version: 2.3-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Petter Reinh

Bug#841179: nslint bug: unknown RR types SSHFP and LOC

Second try, with correct bug number. Such support seem like something that should be fixed upstream. The types are also unknown in version 3.2. Perhaps someone should send a patch upstream implementing support for these? Just a simple patching accepting them but not checking their content would