yatm is marked for autoremoval from testing

yatm 0.9-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-10-17 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1020166: yatm: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary] Error 2 https://bugs.debian.org/1020166 This mail is generated by: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/

libowfat is marked for autoremoval from testing

libowfat 0.30-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-10-12 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1017157: libowfat-dev: libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 https://bugs.debian.org/1017157 1017316: libowfat-dev: libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 https://bugs.debian.org/10

Bug#1020806: perl-byacc: reproducible-builds: differing buildid in in /usr/bin/pbyacc

Source: perl-byacc Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: buildpath X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org The buildid differs in /usr/bin/pbyacc when built with a different build path: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/deb

Bug#1020800: libapache-mod-evasive: reproducible-builds: Embedded build paths in mod_evasive20.so

Source: libapache-mod-evasive Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: buildpath X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org The build path is embedded in /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_evasive20.so: https://tests.reproducible-builds.or

Bug#1020798: netkit-rsh: reproducible-builds: Embedded build paths in binaries

Source: netkit-rsh Severity: normal Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: buildpath X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org The build path is embedded in various binaries: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffo

Bug#1020771: sendmail: french package description contains duplicated text

Le 26/09/2022 à 19:09, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : Hi Yvan, thanks for spotting this issue. On 26/09/2022 13.59, Yvan Masson wrote: I had a quick look on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sendmail but could not find where is stored this translation: for my general knowledge, could you tell me wh

Bug#991331: sid listed as affected

On 24/09/2022 11.16, Marco wrote: Why is sid (that has 8.17.1.9-1) still listed as affected by ALPACA? https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3618 This thread says this is has already been fixed with 8.16.1. Right now, I see this as fixed in the security tracker, but maybe the m

Bug#1020771: sendmail: french package description contains duplicated text

Hi Yvan, thanks for spotting this issue. On 26/09/2022 13.59, Yvan Masson wrote: I had a quick look on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sendmail but could not find where is stored this translation: for my general knowledge, could you tell me where it is? These translations are not part of the

Bug#1020771: sendmail: french package description contains duplicated text

Package: sendmail Severity: minor Version: 8.17.1.9-1 Dear maintainers, I am using current testing, with french locale. sendmail’s package description returned by `apt show sendmail` contains duplicated text: … . Ce paquet prend en charge REGEX, DB, NIS, NIS+, LDAP, DNS maps, et active TCP