apt-move is marked for autoremoval from testing

2020-03-07 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
apt-move 4.2.27-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2020-03-22 It is affected by these RC bugs: 930663: apt-move: Port to apt 1.9

rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 21:19:37 +0100 Source: rafkill Architecture: source Version: 1.2.2-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Håvard Flaget Aasen Closes: 947578 Changes: rafkil

Processing of rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.changes

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rafkill_1.2.2-7.dsc rafkill_1.2.2-7.debian.tar.xz rafkill_1.2.2-7_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 21:09:31 +0100 Source: libopendbx Architecture: source Version: 1.4.6-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: David Bürgin Changes: libopendbx (1.4.6-14) un

Bug#947578: marked as done (FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Mar 2020 01:19:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947578: fixed in rafkill 1.2.2-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #947578, regarding FTBFS with scons 3.1.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processing of libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.changes

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libopendbx_1.4.6-14.dsc libopendbx_1.4.6-14.debian.tar.xz libopendbx_1.4.6-14_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 15:59:45 +0100 Source: c-icap-modules Architecture: source Version: 1:0.5.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Håvard Flaget Aasen Closes: 952009 Changes

Bug#952009: marked as done (c-icap-modules: FTBFS: clamav_mod.c:108:13: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before string constant)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Mar 2020 00:34:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#952009: fixed in c-icap-modules 1:0.5.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #952009, regarding c-icap-modules: FTBFS: clamav_mod.c:108:13: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before string constant to be marked a

Processing of c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.changes

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.dsc c-icap-modules_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.xz c-icap-modules_0.5.4-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on h

sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 00:39:49 +0100 Source: sendmail Architecture: source Version: 8.15.2-18 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann Changes: sendmail (8.15.2-18)

Processing of sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.changes

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sendmail_8.15.2-18.dsc sendmail_8.15.2-18.debian.tar.xz sendmail_8.15.2-18_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable

2020-03-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: sgmltools-lite | 3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-20 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA: sgmltools-lite, py2, superceded by docbook-utils ---

Bug#938473: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #938473, regarding sgmltools-lite: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#94649: marked as done (sgmltools-lite doesn't move tmp with custom stylesheet)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #94649, regarding sgmltools-lite doesn't move tmp with custom stylesheet to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#64334: marked as done (Interpretation of postscript output fails when GIF images are included)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #64334, regarding Interpretation of postscript output fails when GIF images are included to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#191881: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: sgmltools --backend html fails with openjade)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #191881, regarding sgmltools-lite: sgmltools --backend html fails with openjade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#871760: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #871752, regarding sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#871752: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #871752, regarding sgmltools-lite: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#380949: marked as done (Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #380949, regarding Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module ! to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#106028: marked as done (sgmltools-2: cannot use nochunks)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #106028, regarding sgmltools-2: cannot use nochunks to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#168573: marked as done (sgmltools-lite: Docbook Style Sheet for HTML not found)

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:21:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947027: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #168573, regarding sgmltools-lite: Docbook Style Sheet for HTML not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Processed: tagging 953243, tagging 930663, tagging 930673, tagging 931133, found 953308 in 3.0.4-1 ...

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 953243 + sid bullseye Bug #953243 [ssh-import-id] ssh-import-id: Fails with Python 3.8 Added tag(s) sid and bullseye. > tags 930663 + sid bullseye Bug #930663 [apt-move] apt-move: Port to apt 1.9 Added tag(s) bullseye and sid. > tags 930673 +

Bug#930663: Raising severity of apt-1.9.0 bugs to serious

2020-03-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: severity -1 serious We're about to start the APT transition, which means failure to build against the new apt is becoming a serious issue. Of the bugs this email is sent to, openscap requires further work, see the diff: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/466833401/openscap_1.2.16-2ubuntu2_1

Processed: Raising severity of apt-1.9.0 bugs to serious

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #930663 [apt-move] apt-move: Port to apt 1.9 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 930663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930663 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Raising severity of apt-1.9.0 bugs to serious

2020-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #931133 [apt-xapian-index] apt-xapian-index: unusable after recent python-apt update due to usage of deprecated Package.section attribute Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 931133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu