Processed: Re: Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #930869 [pm-utils] Don't release with buster Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' -- 930869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930869 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

Control: severity -1 wishlist On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:00:38PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 24.06.19 um 00:46 schrieb Ivo De Decker: > > acpi-support depends on it, so removal is not possible. And even if it was, > > it > > would probably be too late for that. > > > > Tagging this bug bust

Bug#931162: marked as done (splitvt FTCBFS: build for the wrong architecture)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Jun 2019 21:37:13 +0200 with message-id <20190627193712.ga3...@alf.mars> and subject line Re: Bug#931162: splitvt FTCBFS: build for the wrong architecture has caused the Debian Bug report #931162, regarding splitvt FTCBFS: build for the wrong architecture to be marked as

Bug#930869: Don't release with buster

Hi Ivo Am 24.06.19 um 00:46 schrieb Ivo De Decker: > Control: tags -1 buster-ignore > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released >> with buster. > > acpi-support depends on it, so removal is

Bug#866472: Uniconvertor 2.0 upstream depends on python-pil and has some .debs

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:07:53PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:24:15AM +0200, Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote: > > > > Hello. Maybe you know already (because the problem seems to be lack of > > maintainer). But there is a python-uniconvertor 2.0 that no longer depends > >

Bug#866472: Uniconvertor 2.0 upstream depends on python-pil and has some .debs

El Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:07:53PM +0200, Agustin Martin deia: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:24:15AM +0200, Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote: > > > > Hello. Maybe you know already (because the problem seems to be lack of > > maintainer). But there is a python-uniconvertor 2.0 that no longer depends > > o

Bug#866472: Uniconvertor 2.0 upstream depends on python-pil and has some .debs

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:24:15AM +0200, Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote: > > Hello. Maybe you know already (because the problem seems to be lack of > maintainer). But there is a python-uniconvertor 2.0 that no longer depends on > python-imaging but on python-pil (python2, I believe) > > https://sk1p

Processed: found 929850 in 0.6.25, tagging 928339

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 929850 0.6.25 Bug #929850 {Done: Nicholas Guriev } [dhelp] dhelp: possible conflict between the "dhelp" package and the KDE packages on debian buster Marked as found in versions dhelp/0.6.25. > tags 928339 - stretch Bug #928339 {Done: Laure

Bug#931161: mgdiff FTCBFS: build for the wrong architecture

Source: mgdiff Version: 1.0 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Hi, mgdiff fails to cross build because it does not pass cross build tools to make. Using "dh_auto_build" instead of "$(MAKE)" can solve this problem.

Bug#931162: splitvt FTCBFS: build for the wrong architecture

Source: splitvt Version: 1.6.6 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Hi, splitvt fails to cross build because it does not pass cross build tools to make. Adding buildtools.mk and re-defining the compiler can solve th