bitcoin

Thank you for being involved in the Bitcoin community. I noticed you have a link to Bitcoin.org on your site here . You may not be aware of it, but there has been a huge amount of censorship taking place on Bitcoin.org and oth

unadf_0.7.11a-3+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:11:18 -0400 Source: unadf Binary: unadf Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.7.11a-3+deb8u1 Distribution: stable-security Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Luciano Bello Descri

Bug#838248: marked as done (unadf: CVE-2016-1243 and CVE-2016-1244)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2016 22:03:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#838248: fixed in unadf 0.7.11a-3+deb8u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #838248, regarding unadf: CVE-2016-1243 and CVE-2016-1244 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#839669: `(cvs.info.gz)CVS commands' could be less confusing

Package: cvs Version: 2:1.12.13+real-15 Severity: wishlist I was confused for a bit today because I ended up looking at this info page. I had half-remembered that `cvs init' existed but didn't find it and convinced myself I had imagined it. The info page has a list of cvs subcommands preceded by

Processed: Qt4's WebKit removal: rising severity to important

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #784470 [src:hotot] [hotot] Qt4's WebKit removal Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' -- 784470: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784470 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

libnss-ldap_265-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 13:00:50 +0100 Source: libnss-ldap Binary: libnss-ldap Architecture: source amd64 Version: 265-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Chris Lamb Description:

Processing of libnss-ldap_265-5_amd64.changes

libnss-ldap_265-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libnss-ldap_265-5.dsc libnss-ldap_265.orig.tar.gz libnss-ldap_265-5.debian.tar.xz libnss-ldap-dbgsym_265-5_amd64.deb libnss-ldap_265-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

Bug#834324: marked as done (libnss-ldap: please make the build reproducible)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:07:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#834324: fixed in libnss-ldap 265-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #834324, regarding libnss-ldap: please make the build reproducible to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Re: libnss-ldap: please make the build reproducible

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 834324 + pending Bug #834324 [src:libnss-ldap] libnss-ldap: please make the build reproducible Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 834324: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

Bug#834324: libnss-ldap: please make the build reproducible

tags 834324 + pending thanks Whoops... Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#834324: closed by Chris Lamb (Bug#834324: fixed in libnss-ldap 265-4)

Control: reopen -1 Hi Chris, On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:30:12PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Changes: > libnss-ldap (265-4) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* QA upload. >* Make the build reproducible. Thanks to Reiner Herrmann > > for the patch. (Closes: #834324) >

Processed: Re: Bug#834324 closed by Chris Lamb (Bug#834324: fixed in libnss-ldap 265-4)

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #834324 {Done: Chris Lamb } [src:libnss-ldap] libnss-ldap: please make the build reproducible 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No

Bug#839626: anon-proxy: outdated and unmaintained upstream

package: anon-proxy severity: serious x-debbugs-cc: pkg-privacy-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 05:49:29PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Holger Levsen: > > I noticed src:anon-proxy was uploaded today (*) and I am wondering: does it > > still work at all? Is it recommended t