blackbox_0.70.1-15_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-01-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:22:54 +0900 Source: blackbox Binary: blackbox libbt-dev libbt0 libbt Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.70.1-15 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: HIG

Bug#697381: marked as done (blackbox: FTBFS: symbols file mismatch on m68k)

2013-01-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jan 2013 06:47:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697381: fixed in blackbox 0.70.1-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #697381, regarding blackbox: FTBFS: symbols file mismatch on m68k to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processing of blackbox_0.70.1-15_amd64.changes

2013-01-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
blackbox_0.70.1-15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: blackbox_0.70.1-15.dsc blackbox_0.70.1-15.debian.tar.gz blackbox_0.70.1-15_amd64.deb libbt-dev_0.70.1-15_amd64.deb libbt0_0.70.1-15_amd64.deb libbt_0.70.1-15_all.deb Greetings, Your Debia

Bug#698537: xalan xsl:message segment fault on suspected buffer overflow

2013-01-19 Thread Brett Wuth
Package: xalan Version: 1.10-4 Severity: normal xalan crashes with a segment fault when using with large output. For example: bug.xsl: ---cut--- http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; version="1.0" > 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901

ferret_0.6-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-01-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:54:02 +0100 Source: ferret Binary: ferret Architecture: source all Version: 0.6-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld Description: ferret

Processing of ferret_0.6-4_amd64.changes

2013-01-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ferret_0.6-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ferret_0.6-4.dsc ferret_0.6-4.debian.tar.gz ferret_0.6-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@list

texi2html_1.82+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-01-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:29:51 +0100 Source: texi2html Binary: texi2html Architecture: source all Version: 1.82+dfsg1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld Descripti

Processing of texi2html_1.82+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes

2013-01-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
texi2html_1.82+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: texi2html_1.82+dfsg1-1.dsc texi2html_1.82+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz texi2html_1.82+dfsg1-1.diff.gz texi2html_1.82+dfsg1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debia

Re: Please review package description of (open)motif

2013-01-19 Thread Justin B Rye
Paul Gevers wrote: > Agreeing with your argument, I would go for > > Description: Motif Window Manager Oh! Hurrah. [...] >>> contains the Motif window manager, which has clear but classical >>> appearance, >> >> "(It) has clear appearance" sounds like it's missing an article. >> >> (Clas

Re: Please review package description of (open)motif

2013-01-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Justin and the rest, On 19-01-13 15:00, Justin B Rye wrote: > Paul Gevers wrote: >> [Please keep cc in the loop.] >> Package: motif-clients > > What does this package name mean, anyway? Is the idea that it's a set > of executables that have a client relationship towards Motif, whatever > tha

Re: Please review package description of (open)motif

2013-01-19 Thread Justin B Rye
Paul Gevers wrote: > [Please keep cc in the loop.] > > Currently, Graham and I are working on getting (open)motif [1] in shape > for inclusion in main. While I was going through the package I was > unhappy with the current description of the binary packages. I have > already extended the descripti

Please review package description of (open)motif

2013-01-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi all, [Please keep cc in the loop.] Currently, Graham and I are working on getting (open)motif [1] in shape for inclusion in main. While I was going through the package I was unhappy with the current description of the binary packages. I have already extended the description of motif-clients, b