Bug#691095: libvigraimpex packaging (symbols) breaks with gcc != 4.7

2013-01-13 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andreas Metzler , 2012-10-21, 14:20: Perhaps old fashioned shlibs might be a better choice than a symbols file. For what it's worth, I agree with you assessment. Before I orphaned the package, I maintained the symbols files, which was doable, but rather tiresome, and the benefits of doing t

libvigraimpex_1.8.0+dfsg-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2013-01-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:10:39 +0100 Source: libvigraimpex Binary: libvigraimpex-dev libvigraimpex4 libvigraimpex-doc python-vigra python-vigra-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.8.0+dfsg-2 Distribution: experi

Bug#691095: marked as done (libvigraimpex packaging (symbols) breaks with gcc != 4.7)

2013-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:47:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#691095: fixed in libvigraimpex 1.8.0+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #691095, regarding libvigraimpex packaging (symbols) breaks with gcc != 4.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processing of libvigraimpex_1.8.0+dfsg-2_i386.changes

2013-01-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libvigraimpex_1.8.0+dfsg-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libvigraimpex_1.8.0+dfsg-2.dsc libvigraimpex_1.8.0+dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz libvigraimpex-dev_1.8.0+dfsg-2_i386.deb libvigraimpex4_1.8.0+dfsg-2_i386.deb python-vigra_1.8.0+dfsg-2_i386.deb libvig

Bug#681077: marked as done (libvigraimpex: Build-Depend on libtiff5-dev)

2013-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:19:38 +0100 with message-id <20130113111938.ga3...@downhill.g.la> and subject line Re: Bug#681077: libvigraimpex: Build-Depend on libtiff5-dev has caused the Debian Bug report #681077, regarding libvigraimpex: Build-Depend on libtiff5-dev to be marked as done.