Bug#669763: Apache2 2.4 transition postponed until after Wheezy

2012-05-17 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, we have decided to postpone the transition to apache2 2.4. The main blocker is that mod_perl needs a major new upstream release which very likely won't be ready in time for Wheezy and we don't want to release Wheezy without mod_perl. The transition will probably happen shortly after the rel

Bug#666838: Apache2 2.4 transition postponed until after Wheezy

2012-05-17 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, we have decided to postpone the transition to apache2 2.4. The main blocker is that mod_perl needs a major new upstream release which very likely won't be ready in time for Wheezy and we don't want to release Wheezy without mod_perl. The transition will probably happen shortly after the rel

Bug#673302: this is important...

2012-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
severity 673302 important thanks Hi, this bug then indirectly leads to this: failed powerpc build of gnunet 0.9.2-1 https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gnunet&arch=powerpc&ver=0.9.2-1&stamp=1337276678&file=log and ia64 https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gnunet&arch=ia64&ver=0.9.2-1&sta

Processed: this is important...

2012-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 673302 important Bug #673302 [gnunet] dependency on libextractor-dev misses the epoch Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673302: http://bugs.debian.o

Bug#621645: marked as done (gnunet - new upstream available)

2012-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 May 2012 16:48:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#621645: fixed in gnunet 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #621645, regarding gnunet - new upstream available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#652951: marked as done (gnunet - new upstream available)

2012-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 May 2012 16:48:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#621645: fixed in gnunet 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #621645, regarding gnunet - new upstream available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#668766: marked as done (gnunet-server: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /etc/default/gnunet-server)

2012-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 May 2012 16:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#668766: fixed in gnunet 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #668766, regarding gnunet-server: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /etc/default/gnunet-server to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#673301: useless use of dpkg-statoverride

2012-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
package: gnunet version: 0.9.2-1 Hi Bertrand, as you will have noticed, I've sponsored your gnunet upload to sid ;-) I've done that, despite that I think your use of dpkg-statoverride is wrong, based on my experiences with munin, where I've removed a similar usage in April, which was in place

Bug#651192: marked as done (gnunet-client: misses dependency on gnunet-tools)

2012-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 May 2012 16:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651192: fixed in gnunet 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #651192, regarding gnunet-client: misses dependency on gnunet-tools to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#663432: marked as done ([INTL: it] Italian translation of debconf messages - gnunet)

2012-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 May 2012 16:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#663432: fixed in gnunet 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #663432, regarding [INTL: it] Italian translation of debconf messages - gnunet to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#673302: dependency on libextractor-dev misses the epoch

2012-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
package: gnunet version: 0.9.2-1 Hi, currently gnunet 0.9.2-1 build-depends on libextractor-dev (>=0.6.1) among others. But, libextractor-dev has an epoch, so even the version in stable, 1:0.5.23+dfsg-7, will make dpkg think it's sufficient, while it's not, causing a build failure. cheers,

Bug#673304: libextractor: please migrate the libpoppler-dev build dependency to libpoppler-private-dev

2012-05-17 Thread Pino Toscano
Package: libextractor Version: 0.6.3-4 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, I'm planning a move of the poppler private headers, currently shipped in libpoppler-dev, out of that package (which is installed by other poppler -dev packages) to a new libpoppler-private-dev. Could you please switch the l

Bug#664809: marked as done (wdm: Please add calls to pam_selinux module in pam files)

2012-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 May 2012 11:21:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664809: fixed in wdm 1.28-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #664809, regarding wdm: Please add calls to pam_selinux module in pam files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

wdm_1.28-12_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-05-17 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: wdm_1.28-12.debian.tar.gz to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-12.debian.tar.gz wdm_1.28-12.dsc to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-12.dsc wdm_1.28-12_i386.deb to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-12_i386.deb Changes: wdm (1.28-12) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Add calls to pam_selinux module in pam file

Processing of wdm_1.28-12_i386.changes

2012-05-17 Thread Debian FTP Masters
wdm_1.28-12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: wdm_1.28-12.dsc wdm_1.28-12.debian.tar.gz wdm_1.28-12_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.de