On 2012-05-15 18:19, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 15:20:50 -0400
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
[...]
adept is a package manager, displaying wrong descriptions makes it unfit
for release.
Not true - it is a bug but as long as adept can install packages from
the package names and get the
On 04/30/12 10:25, Bertrand Marc wrote:
Hello Cyril,
Thank you for the report and these patches. I am trying to adopt
GNUnet (0.9.2-1 is already on mentors). Did you provide patches
against the current version in unstable or the one in mentors ?
Sorry for the late reply. The patches are again
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454046,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #405715,
regarding adept_installer process remains after exiting adept-installer during
package configuration
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #540649,
regarding adept: Uses an embedded copy of libept.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #439806,
regarding adept-manager: sort by popcon statistics
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #516791,
regarding adept is hidden when started through start menu or kdesu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454046,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454044,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #405758,
regarding adept-installer: unparsed SGML character entity in details tooltips
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454046,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #673040,
regarding [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454045,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #416867,
regarding adept-notifier: adept doesn't respected hold flag
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454044,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454044,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #401004,
regarding adept-manager: Desktop Entry (menu) GenericName not a name
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #445649,
regarding Support and display Homepage field
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454045,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #454045,
regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use
su-to-root instead of kdesu
to be marked as done.
Thi
Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
adept | 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
adept | 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+b1 | hurd-i386
Package: synfigstudio
Version: 0.62.00-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi, when I start Synfigstudio, it throws me the next messages:
~$ synfigstudio
Synfig Studio: iniciando aplicación...
synfig(18267) [14:29:28] información: Cargando módulos desde
/
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 10:59:26 +0300
with message-id <871umky2sh@test20.cante.net>
and subject line Bug#600074 Close bts:debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #600074,
regarding wmbubble: FTBFS unstable - undefined reference to 'XrmInitialize'
to be marked as done.
This means t
24 matches
Mail list logo
