Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
> one does not. Still I see it showing up as a Provides in PTS. I am not
> sure if something needs to be done in some mysterious Debian server to
> resolve that but the 1.2-2 version of w3c-sgml-lib does
Joey,
Also what happens when you force through the installation of
w3c-dtd-xhtml version 1.2-2 and w3c-sgml-lib? Does wdg-html-validator
behave itself for you then?
On 20/04/12 00:51, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
one does not. S
Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
one does not. Still I see it showing up as a Provides in PTS. I am not
sure if something needs to be done in some mysterious Debian server to
resolve that but the 1.2-2 version of w3c-sgml-lib does NOT have a
Provides clause.
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not
> afterwards because I tried to test it.
w3c-sgml-lib provides/conflicts w3c-dtd-xhtml, and w3c-markup-validator
depends on both packages, so this happens:
joey@wren:~>validate index.html
joey@wren:~>sudo a
Joey,
Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not afterwards
because I tried to test it.
On 19/04/12 22:46, Joey Hess wrote:
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I am just about to upload w3c-sgml-lib that also generates
w3c-dtd-xhtml (which will depend on w3c-sgml-lib and consist of
links
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 669480 wdg-html-validator
Bug #669480 [w3c-html-validator] w3c-html-validator is 100% broken by recent
w3c-sgml-lib (1.2-2)
Warning: Unknown package 'w3c-html-validator'
Bug reassigned from package 'w3c-html-validator' to 'wdg-html-valid
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> I am just about to upload w3c-sgml-lib that also generates
> w3c-dtd-xhtml (which will depend on w3c-sgml-lib and consist of
> links). I have endeavoured to fix all conflicts and ensure that
> nsgmls, wdg-html-validator, w3c-markup-validator still work. I have
> to put a ca
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb: package says section is oldlibs,
override says utils.
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says optio
Accepted:
kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
to main/k/kerneloops/kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.debian.tar.gz
to mai
/kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
kerneloops-applet_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes removed.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running
+git20090217-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> cc -O2 -g -fstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURC
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.dsc
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3.debian.tar.gz
kerneloops_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
kerneloops-daemon_0.12+git20090217-3_amd64.deb
kerneloops-applet_0.12+
Source: kerneloops
Version: 0.12+git20090217-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> cc -O2
Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:02:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#669144: fixed in libgui-commands-java 1.1.43-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #669144,
regarding [PATCH] libgui-commands-java: packaging 3.0 and fix
build-depends-on-obsolete-package default-jdk-builddep
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.43-6_amd64.deb: package says section is java,
override says libs.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, datab
Accepted:
libgui-commands-java-doc_1.1.43-6_all.deb
to main/libg/libgui-commands-java/libgui-commands-java-doc_1.1.43-6_all.deb
libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.43-6_amd64.deb
to main/libg/libgui-commands-java/libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.43-6_amd64.deb
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.debian.tar.g
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.dsc
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6.debian.tar.gz
libgui-commands-java_1.1.43-6_all.deb
libgui-commands-java-doc_1.1.43-6_all.deb
libgui-commands-java-gcj_1.1.4
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package sflphone
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #601164 (http://bugs.debian.org/601164)
# Bug title: sflphoned: Uniformative SFLPHONE
Accepted:
ppmd_10.1-5.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/ppmd/ppmd_10.1-5.debian.tar.gz
ppmd_10.1-5.dsc
to main/p/ppmd/ppmd_10.1-5.dsc
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb
to main/p/ppmd/ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb
Changes:
ppmd (10.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Orphan package, set maintainer to Debian QA Group.
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ppmd_10.1-5.dsc
ppmd_10.1-5.debian.tar.gz
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
ppmd_10.1-5.dsc
ppmd_10.1-5.debian.tar.gz
ppmd_10.1-5_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-req
21 matches
Mail list logo
