Bug#664809: wdm: Please add calls to pam_selinux module in pam files

2012-03-20 Thread bigon
Package: wdm Version: 1.28-11 Severity: wishlist User: selinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: selinux-dm Dear maintainer, To ease the use of selinux in debian for the user, it could be convinient if the desktop managers were calling the necessary pam module required to properly set the u

Processed: tagging 664612

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 664612 + help Bug #664612 [src:wu-ftpd] wu-ftpd: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 'dqb_fhardlimit' Added tag(s) help. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 664612: http:

Bug#664772: israndom: lzma/ppmd compression do not work: "Error, cannot load compressor lzmax."

2012-03-20 Thread Linus Lüssing
Package: israndom Version: 1.0.7-4 Severity: normal Hi, I am trying to figure out how to use the other compression methods. But so far, only bzlib seems to work: $ israndom -q -c bzlib some.rand $ israndom -q -c lzma some.rand Error, cannot load compressor lzma. $ israndom -q -c lzmax some.rand

Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-03-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The v

Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-03-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: popfile | 0.22.4-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, unused -- Note that the package(s) have si

Bug#664324: marked as done ([PATCH] popfile: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #664324, regarding [PATCH] popfile: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#664507: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-03-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 0.9.3-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package blm has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664507 The versio

Bug#664507: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-03-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: blm |0.9.3-4 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc --- Reason -

Bug#462683: marked as done (New upstream release: 1.0.0)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #538080, regarding New upstream release: 1.0.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#538080: marked as done (popfile: new upstream release v1.1.0)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #538080, regarding popfile: new upstream release v1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#538080: marked as done (popfile: new upstream release v1.1.0)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #462683, regarding popfile: new upstream release v1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#462683: marked as done (New upstream release: 1.0.0)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #462683, regarding New upstream release: 1.0.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#458349: marked as done (popfile: An error has occurred which has caused POPFile to return the error 500.)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #458349, regarding popfile: An error has occurred which has caused POPFile to return the error 500. to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#438464: marked as done (popfile: Doesn't handle headers with mixed dos and unix newlines too well)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #438464, regarding popfile: Doesn't handle headers with mixed dos and unix newlines too well to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#366402: marked as done (popfile: Closes when non-root does "nmap localhost")

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #366402, regarding popfile: Closes when non-root does "nmap localhost" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#309996: marked as done (popfile: Confuses Evolution)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #309996, regarding popfile: Confuses Evolution to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#269771: marked as done (popfile: should provide per user settings)

2012-03-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #269771, regarding popfile: should provide per user settings to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#664715: kerneloops: default submission site dead, should not be shipped in wheezy

2012-03-20 Thread Paul Wise
Package: kerneloops-daemon Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org The default submission site for kerneloops-daemon is dead and does not appear to be coming back any time soon, despite recentish interest: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/1/436 https://lkml.org