Accepted:
b43-fwcutter_013-3.debian.tar.gz
to contrib/b/b43-fwcutter/b43-fwcutter_013-3.debian.tar.gz
b43-fwcutter_013-3.dsc
to contrib/b/b43-fwcutter/b43-fwcutter_013-3.dsc
b43-fwcutter_013-3_amd64.deb
to contrib/b/b43-fwcutter/b43-fwcutter_013-3_amd64.deb
firmware-b43-installer_4.150.10.
Your message dated Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#446770: fixed in b43-fwcutter 1:013-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #446770,
regarding b43-fwcutter: Option -p doen't exist or is obsolete.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
b43-fwcutter_013-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
b43-fwcutter_013-3.dsc
b43-fwcutter_013-3.debian.tar.gz
firmware-b43-installer_4.150.10.5-5_all.deb
firmware-b43legacy-installer_4.178.10.4-5_all.deb
firmware-b43-lpphy-installer_4.174.64.19-5_all.de
b43-fwcutter_013-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
b43-fwcutter_013-3.dsc
b43-fwcutter_013-3.debian.tar.gz
firmware-b43-installer_4.150.10.5-5_all.deb
firmware-b43legacy-installer_4.178.10.4-5_all.deb
firmware-b43-lpphy-installer_4.174.64
* Bastian Blank [2010-12-08 10:37 +0100]:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:45:30AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > #603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user
> > security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking.
>
> Could you explain why it should be
Hi!
Am 08.12.2010 10:37, schrieb Bastian Blank:
> #564690 is an old example of the same problem.
So is #547092 (which has severity important). And I'm sure if we dig
deep enough, we can find others as well.
>> There's patch floating arround, which has a major regression: It doesn't
>> work fo
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:45:30AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> #603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user
> security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking.
Could you explain why it should be acceptable to announce secure
operation but ignore
Hi!
Am 08.12.2010 09:33, schrieb dave b:
>> I verified it, and your patch works: I accepts valid ssl connections,
>> and rejects invalid ones.
At this point I should have also said "many thanks for your work!"
Sorry, didn't had a coffee when I wrote my first mail ;)
>>> +self.sslobj =
On 8 December 2010 18:39, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi dave!
>
> * dave b [101202 05:58]:
>
>> Here have a patch!
>> This obviously will break connecting to hosts which use a self-signed
>> certificate.
>> Perhaps some one else can fix this when they want it fixed ;) ?
>> I tested using
Hi John!
* John Ferlito [100719 15:22]:
> I've already done some work on cleaning up the package, so it is now
> lintian clean. Will begin work on fixing a whole heap of the bugs
> next.
>
> Am aiming to be come the new upstream maintainer.
Looking over the list of release critical bugs, I stu
10 matches
Mail list logo
