Bug#498853: marked as done (libvisual-projectm: jack support)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:36:58 +0200 with message-id and subject line Bug#498853: fixed in projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #498853, regarding libvisual-projectm: jack support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#580304: marked as done (libvisual-projectm: New version)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:37:58 +0200 with message-id <9c0dc3b80c92f51752c447cf72153...@mb8-2.1blu.de> and subject line Bug#580304: fixed in projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #580304, regarding libvisual-projectm: New version to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#590670: marked as done (insecure setuid usage, local root exploit)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:46:00 -0400 with message-id <20100729214600.ga19...@galadriel.inutil.org> and subject line Re: insecure setuid usage, local root exploit has caused the Debian Bug report #590670, regarding insecure setuid usage, local root exploit to be marked as done. This m

Bug#590751: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: hsolink | 1.0.118-3 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --

Bug#583539: Patch for the 0.5-8 NMU of iterm

Dear maintainer of iterm, On Wednesday, July 21, 2010 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial notice sent on Wednesday, July 21, 2010. You either agreed for this NMU or did not respond to my notices. I will now up

Bug#583541: marked as done ([INTL:es] Spanish debconf template translation for mtink)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:02:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583541: fixed in mtink 1.0.16-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #583541, regarding [INTL:es] Spanish debconf template translation for mtink to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#528121: debian

# Hi, I forwarded this issue upstream tag upstream: https://sourceforge.net/projects/xmlresume/forums/forum/92731/topic/1307309/index/page/1 # More: http://rzr.online.fr/q/legal -- # http://rzr.online.fr -- xmpp:rzr[a]jabber.org -- sip:rzr[a]ekiga.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-pac

mtink override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): mtink-doc_1.0.16-3_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug,

mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: mtink-doc_1.0.16-3_all.deb to main/m/mtink/mtink-doc_1.0.16-3_all.deb mtink_1.0.16-3.diff.gz to main/m/mtink/mtink_1.0.16-3.diff.gz mtink_1.0.16-3.dsc to main/m/mtink/mtink_1.0.16-3.dsc mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.deb to main/m/mtink/mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.deb Override entries for your

Processing of mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.changes

DELAYED/7-day/mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.changes is already present on target host: mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.deb Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first. Job mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.changes removed. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBS

Processing of mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.changes

mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mtink_1.0.16-3.dsc mtink_1.0.16-3.diff.gz mtink-doc_1.0.16-3_all.deb mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processing of iterm_0.5-8_i386.changes

iterm_0.5-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: iterm_0.5-8.dsc iterm_0.5-8.diff.gz libiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb libiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb libxiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb libxiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb xiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb fbiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb Greetings,

Processing of mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.changes

mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: mtink_1.0.16-3.dsc mtink_1.0.16-3.diff.gz mtink-doc_1.0.16-3_all.deb mtink_1.0.16-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

hsolink REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the hsolink source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.118-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 20100728 The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reason

Bug#590617: wdm: Why one has to login to do HALT !! Please make LINUX SIMPLE and HUMAN !

severity 590617 wishlist tag 590617 +wontfix thanks On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:53:49AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2010-07-27 22:35:21, schrieb yellow: > > Package: wdm > > Version: 1.28-4 > > Severity: important > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > It is of no senses to make linux asking a login a

Processed: Re: Bug#590617: wdm: Why one has to login to do HALT !! Please make LINUX SIMPLE and HUMAN !

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 590617 wishlist Bug #590617 [wdm] wdm: Why one has to login to do HALT !! Please make LINUX SIMPLE and HUMAN ! Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important' > tag 590617 +wontfix Bug #590617 [wdm] wdm: Why one has to login to do HALT !! P