On 2009-11-02 07:28 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Michael Prokop (m...@debian.org):
>> Package: capiutils
>> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>>
>> Fresh installation:
>>
>> [...]
>> Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4)
Quoting Matthias Klose (d...@cs.tu-berlin.de):
> Package: isdnutils
> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
> Severity: important
> User: d...@debian.org
> Usertags: readline6
>
> Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
> As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Quoting Michael Prokop (m...@debian.org):
> Package: capiutils
> Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Fresh installation:
>
> [...]
> Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
> Setting up capiutils (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
> Note: running
Your message dated Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:02:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552879: fixed in unifdef 1.0+20030701-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552879,
regarding unifdef: FTBFS: unifdef.c:204: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: directvnc
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Dead/missing upstream.
* Buggy.
* ITA'd for over 3 years.
* No reverse
Package: xbsql
Version: 0.11-8
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unst
Package: sqlrelay
Version: 1:0.39.4-9
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
Package: rpncalc
Version: 1.36.8
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in un
Package: rhyme
Version: 0.9-6
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unsta
Package: rpc2
Version: 2.8+debian-4
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in
Package: rplay
Version: 3.3.2-12
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in un
Package: mn-fit
Version: 5.13-7
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in uns
Package: lash
Version: 0.5.4-3
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unst
Package: galternatives
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Missing upstream.
* Buggy.
* ITA'd for over 3 years.
* No reverse
Package: isdnutils
Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now ava
Package: fuzz
Version: 0.6-8
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in unstab
Package: cdcd
Version: 0.6.6-11
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in uns
Package: gdb-m68hc1x
Version: 1:6.4+3.1+dfsg-5
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now a
Package: apachetop
Version: 0.12.6-12
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
Package: rhyme
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Dead upstream.
* Orphaned for over 3 years.
* No reverse depends/build-dep
Package: adesklets
Version: 0.6.1-5
Severity: important
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: readline6
Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html
As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well.
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
in
flex-old_2.5.4a-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flex-old_2.5.4a-8.dsc
flex-old_2.5.4a-8.diff.gz
flex-old-doc_2.5.4a-8_all.deb
flex-old_2.5.4a-8_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSC
Package: capiutils
Version: 1:3.9.20060704-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Fresh installation:
[...]
Setting up libcapi20-3 (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
Setting up capiutils (1:3.9.20060704-4) ...
Note: running MAKEDEV to create CAPI devices in /dev...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/capi
Package: libghttp
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Dead upstream.
* Orphaned for over 3 years.
* No reverse depends/build-
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:15:40 +
with message-id <1257110140.749038.17527.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package python-happydoc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #497703,
regarding python-happydoc: Incomplete debian/copyright
to be marked
xbae_4.60.2-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xbae_4.60.2-3.dsc
xbae_4.60.2-3.diff.gz
libxbae-dev_4.60.2-3_i386.deb
libxbae4_4.60.2-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:37:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#543027: fixed in lineak-kdeplugins 2:0.9-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #543027,
regarding lineak-kdeplugins: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat
`.libs/jukplugin.so': No such file or directory
to be mark
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:37:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#543009: fixed in lineak-xosdplugin 1:0.9-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #543009,
regarding lineak-xosdplugin: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat
`.libs/xosdplugin.so': No such file or directory
to be mar
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:36:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#533954: fixed in ksimus-boolean 0.3.6-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #533954,
regarding ksimus-boolean: FTBFS: required file `admin/config.guess' not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
hamlib_1.2.9-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hamlib_1.2.9-2.dsc
hamlib_1.2.9-2.diff.gz
libhamlib2_1.2.9-2_i386.deb
libhamlib2++c2_1.2.9-2_i386.deb
libhamlib-dev_1.2.9-2_i386.deb
libhamlib++-dev_1.2.9-2_i386.deb
libhamlib2-perl_1.2.9-2_i386.deb
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
python-happydoc | 2.1-6 | source, all
python-happydoc-doc | 2.1-6 | all
--- Reason ---
RoQA; inactive upstream, orphaned,
grig_0.7.2-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grig_0.7.2-3.dsc
grig_0.7.2-3.diff.gz
grig_0.7.2-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian
gpsk31_0.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gpsk31_0.5-2.dsc
gpsk31_0.5-2.diff.gz
gpsk31_0.5-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian
gcb_1.07-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcb_1.07-3.dsc
gcb_1.07-3.diff.gz
gcb_1.07-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
glfer_0.4.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glfer_0.4.1-3.dsc
glfer_0.4.1-3.diff.gz
glfer_0.4.1-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.de
lineak-xosdplugin_0.9-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lineak-xosdplugin_0.9-8.dsc
lineak-xosdplugin_0.9-8.diff.gz
lineak-xosdplugin_0.9-8_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
lineak-kdeplugins_0.9-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lineak-kdeplugins_0.9-6.dsc
lineak-kdeplugins_0.9-6.diff.gz
lineak-kdeplugins_0.9-6_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
ksimus-boolean_0.3.6-14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ksimus-boolean_0.3.6-14.dsc
ksimus-boolean_0.3.6-14.diff.gz
ksimus-boolean_0.3.6-14_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 335087 pending
Bug #335087 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils: [col] last line silently dropped if no
newline
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:28:15AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Actually col removes carriage returns, in contrast to the man page.
Could you please tell me where in the manpage it is said that carriage returns
are not removed? Has this been changed already or am I just to stupid to see it
in col(
FYI: The status of the mmucl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.5.2-1
Current version: 1.5.2-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
FYI: The status of the smart-notifier source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.28-1.1
Current version: 0.28-1.3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wil
FYI: The status of the libvformat source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.13-4
Current version: 1.13-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 367299 pending
Bug #367299 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils: [cal] improve -J description in the
man page
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Package: adesklets
Version: 0.6.1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your execut
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553033: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #553033,
regarding [INTL:ja] please add Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po)
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552166: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #552166,
regarding isdnutils: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf
messages
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#547435: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #547435,
regarding isdnutils: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#551060: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #551060,
regarding [l10n:eu] isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5: updated Basque translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552265: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #552265,
regarding [INTL:es] Spanish debconf template translation for isdnutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#550030: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #550030,
regarding isdnutils: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and debian/control
review
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552463: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #552463,
regarding isdnutils: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#550876: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #550876,
regarding isdnutils: [INTL:fi] Updated Finnish translation of the debconf
templates
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552217: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #552217,
regarding isdnutils: [INTL:it] Italian debconf translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:12:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553078: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #553078,
regarding isdnutils: [INTL:de] German translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
isdnutils_3.9.20060704-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
isdnutils_3.9.20060704-5.dsc
isdnutils_3.9.20060704-5.diff.gz
isdnlog-data_3.9.20060704-5_all.deb
isdnutils-doc_3.9.20060704-5_all.deb
isdnutils_3.9.20060704-5_i386.deb
isdnutils-base_3.9.2006
isdnutils_3.9.20060704-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
isdnutils_3.9.20060704-5.dsc
isdnutils_3.9.20060704-5.diff.gz
isdnlog-data_3.9.20060704-5_all.deb
isdnutils-doc_3.9.20060704-5_all.deb
isdnutils_3.9.20060704-5_i386.deb
isdnutils-
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> Dear Debian maintainer,
>
> On Friday, September 18, 2009, I sent you a notification about the beginning
> of a review
> action on debconf templates for isdnutils.
>
> Then, I sent you a bug report with rewritten templates and announcing
> the be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 507602 pending
Bug #507602 [bsdmainutils] calendar source data filename
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 497014 pending
Bug #497014 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils: [ncal] should support -3 option, too
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:06:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552470: fixed in otrs2 2.3.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #552470,
regarding otrs2: cron job for postmaster mailbox is broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:06:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#548073: fixed in otrs2 2.3.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #548073,
regarding installation of otrs2 breaks apache configuration
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
otrs2_2.3.4-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
otrs2_2.3.4-5.dsc
otrs2_2.3.4-5.diff.gz
otrs2_2.3.4-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.de
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-japanese: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The u
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-arabic: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The use
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-european: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The u
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-chinese: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The us
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-asian: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The use
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-japanese-big:
maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly postinst:23 than
using invoke-rc.d.
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-chinese-big: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. Th
Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553137: fixed in intlfonts 1.2.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #553137,
regarding xfonts-intl-phonetic: maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly
postinst:23 than using invoke-rc.d. The u
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
emacs-intl-fonts_1.2.1-8_all.deb: package says section is x11, override says
fonts.
xfonts-intl-arabic_1.2.1-8_all.deb: package says section is x11, override says
fonts.
xfonts-intl-asian
intlfonts_1.2.1-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
intlfonts_1.2.1-8.dsc
intlfonts_1.2.1-8.diff.gz
xfonts-intl-arabic_1.2.1-8_all.deb
xfonts-intl-asian_1.2.1-8_all.deb
xfonts-intl-chinese_1.2.1-8_all.deb
xfonts-intl-chinese-big_1.2.1-8_all.deb
xfon
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign #553137 intlfonts
Bug #553137 [xfonts-intl-asian] xfonts-intl-asian:
maintainer-script-calls-init-script-directly postinst:23 than
using invoke-rc.d. The use of invoke-rc.d to invoke the
/etc/init.d/* initsc
On 2009-10-29 19:15 +0100, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Package: libncurses5-dbg
> Version: 5.7+20090803-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
> User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
>
> All shared libraries
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This has been addressed in the 20091017 patch
> tags 550716 + fixed-upstream
Bug #550716 [ncurses] ncurses: cross-build fails due to colon in
PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
makeztxt_1.62-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
makeztxt_1.62-1.dsc
makeztxt_1.62.orig.tar.gz
makeztxt_1.62-1.diff.gz
makeztxt_1.62-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
77 matches
Mail list logo
