Bug#552993: liburiparser1: improve description

Package: liburiparser1 Severity: minor Hello The description for liburiparser includes this: URIs are used to identify and locate resources, like http://www.debian.org or ISBN:0-395-36341-1. I’d have three suggestions: * use the canonical form for the http URI, i.e. http://www.debian.org/ *

Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === afbackup: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon: - #552669 maintainer-script-modifies-netbase-managed

Bug#552840: bsdgames: FTBFS: boggle/boggle/extern.h:46: error: conflicting types for 'getline'

Source: bsdgames Version: 2.17-16 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. In eglibc <= 2.9, getline was only defined if _GNU_SOU

Processed: severity of 549401 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 549401 serious Bug #549401 [ispell] fails to build with gcc-4.4/newer eglibc Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Bug#552846: gmrun: FTBFS: gtkcompletionline.cc:406: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(const void*, const void*)' to 'int (*)(const dirent**, const dirent**)'

Source: gmrun Version: 0.9.1-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.

Bug#552862: postman: FTBFS: cgi-lib.c:238: error: conflicting types for 'getline'

Source: postman Version: 2.1-6 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. In eglibc <= 2.9, getline was only defined if _GNU_SOURCE

Processed: severity of 549513 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 549513 serious Bug #549513 [wvdial] fails to build with newer eglibc/gcc-4.4 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Bug#552884: spline: FTBFS: utils.h:34: error: conflicting types for 'getline'

Source: spline Version: 1.1-13 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. In eglibc <= 2.9, getline was only defined if _GNU_SOURCE

Bug#552834: metamail: FTBFS: uue.c:33: error: conflicting types for 'getline'

Source: metamail Version: 2.7-54 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. In eglibc <= 2.9, getline was only defined if _GNU_SOU

Bug#552896: thttpd: FTBFS: htpasswd.c:57: error: conflicting types for 'getline'

Source: thttpd Version: 2.25b-8 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. In eglibc <= 2.9, getline was only defined if _GNU_SOURCE

Bug#444312: marked as done (gq crashes on amd64 "Segmentation fault (core dumped)")

Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:08:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#444312: fixed in gq 1.3.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #444312, regarding gq crashes on amd64 "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#536946: marked as done (libroxen-ecms: FTBFS: /bin/sh: cpio: command not found)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:11:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#536946: fixed in libroxen-ecms 2927-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #536946, regarding libroxen-ecms: FTBFS: /bin/sh: cpio: command not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#449749: marked as done (gq: debian/watch fails to report upstream's version)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:08:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#449749: fixed in gq 1.3.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #449749, regarding gq: debian/watch fails to report upstream's version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#209945: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:11:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#209945: fixed in libroxen-ecms 2927-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #209945, regarding The package description does not follow Debian policy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#534705: marked as done (gq: new upstream version 1.3.4)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:08:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#534705: fixed in gq 1.3.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #534705, regarding gq: new upstream version 1.3.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#552669: maintainer-script-modifies-netbase-managed-file preinst:9 /etc/services

Package: afbackup Version: 3.5.3-2 Severity: serious User: lintian-ma...@debian.org Usertags: maintainer-script-modifies-netbase-managed-file Justification: The configuration files /etc/services, /etc/protocols, and /etc/rpc are managed by the netbase package and must not be

Веерные рассылки

Мало покупателей? Есть выход! Результативная электронная почтовая *рас с ы лка* - Ваша реклама на электронную почту Ваших новых клиентов +7 ( 4 95) 2 2 0 _ 1 5 _ 5 8