Bug#526671: remotefs 0.12 fix this problem. Please upgrade the actual debian version

Hi, According to https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1078078&aid=2831831&group_id=229928 this bug is fixed in 0.12. Could you please upgrade remotefs to the latest version? Thanks, Fabrice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#545938: linuxlogo: FTFBS on sh4

Package: linuxlogo Version: 5.06-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-...@superh.org Usertags: sh4 Hi, I am now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH CPU(sh4). linuxlogo FTBFS on sh4. Current linuxlogo package doesn't support sh4. But because this support sh3 , this can support SuperH(sh)

unfs3 0.9.22+dfsg-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the unfs3 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.9.22+dfsg-1 Current version: 0.9.22+dfsg-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wi

kphotobymail 0.4.1-4 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the kphotobymail source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.4.1-3 Current version: 0.4.1-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re

Bug#545604: marked as done (debtags-edit: FTBFS: TagMenu.tcc:74: error: 'auto_ptr' was not declared in this scope)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#545604: fixed in debtags-edit 1.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #545604, regarding debtags-edit: FTBFS: TagMenu.tcc:74: error: 'auto_ptr' was not declared in this scope to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#542740: marked as done (debtags-edit: use ‘Homepage’ field (not ‘Description’) for program homepage)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#542740: fixed in debtags-edit 1.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #542740, regarding debtags-edit: use ‘Homepage’ field (not ‘Description’) for program homepage to be marked as done. This means that you clai

debtags-edit_1.5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: debtags-edit_1.5.dsc to pool/main/d/debtags-edit/debtags-edit_1.5.dsc debtags-edit_1.5.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debtags-edit/debtags-edit_1.5.tar.gz debtags-edit_1.5_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debtags-edit/debtags-edit_1.5_i386.deb Override entries for your package: debtags-edit_1.5.ds

Bug#524554: Official Prize Notification.‏

Your e-mail address has won the British Telecom Promotion.Therefore you have been approve to claim the sum of 1,000,000.00 GBP. Send Names: Address: Country: Phone No: Occupation: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Processing of debtags-edit_1.5_i386.changes

debtags-edit_1.5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debtags-edit_1.5.dsc debtags-edit_1.5.tar.gz debtags-edit_1.5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ.

Bug#545834: ivtools: FTBFS: On 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'osboolean' loses precision

Source: ivtools Version: 1.2.6-1 Severity: serious Hi, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of ivtools_1.2.6-1 on excelsior by sbuild/amd64 98 > Build started at 20090906-1809 [...] > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.0), quilt, x11-utils, xutils-dev, >

Bug#545823: bibtool: check.rule bug (BibTool ERROR: Unexpected end of braces.)

Package: bibtool Version: 2.48alpha.2-4 Severity: normal bibtool accepts check.rule { year "." "\$: bad year\n" } but not check.rule { year "" "\$: bad year\n" } even though the latter form is chosen as an example in the reference manual (/usr/share/doc/bibtool/bibtool.dvi.gz Section A.11.